Millennium Retail Park Car Park & 59 Bugsby's Way and land bound by Bugsby's Way, Peartree Way and Commercial Way, SE7 - Ref: 24/1965/F
June 17, 2025 Planning Board (Committee) Approved View on council websiteThis summary is generated by AI from the council’s published record and supporting documents. Check the full council record and source link before relying on it.
Summary
... full planning permission was granted for a comprehensive mixed-use redevelopment comprising demolition of a commercial unit and construction of new buildings with residential, commercial, and community spaces, subject to referral to the Mayor of London, completion of a Section 106 agreement, and specified conditions.
Full council record
Content
Resolved that full planning
permission be granted for the Comprehensive mixed-use
redevelopment of the site comprising the demolition of the existing
commercial unit and provision of new buildings and basement
comprising residential (Use Class C3), flexible commercial and
community uses (Classes E, F1 and Sui Generis), new public square,
car parking, cycle parking, private and communal amenity space,
access and servicing arrangements, plant, and other associated
works.
Subject to:
- Referral of the
application to the Mayor of London as required under the terms of
The Town and Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order
2008;
- The satisfactory
completion of a Section 106 (S106) Legal Agreement (obligations set
out in Section 26) with an update for the Transport Contribution
towards “improving pedestrian and cyclists connections within
the vicinity of the site” which shall also seek to contribute
to the removal of the Angerstein Roundabout, if considered
feasible.
and
· Conditions set out in
Appendix 2 and its addendum and the following amendments
Condition 21 (Updated Active Travel Zone Assessment)
- That the penultimate bullet point be amended to
read:
o An assessment of the
route to Westcombe Park Station, the
A102 overbridge, and the connection to Cycleway 4, identifying and
recommending public realm and safety improvements such as enhanced
lighting, CCTV, and activation of underused spaces;
- That a new bullet point be added to
read:
an assessment of the potential impact of removing the
Angerstein Roundabout, in accordance with the Royal Borough of
Greenwich’s transport policy objectives, on active travel
opportunities in the local area. This should include consideration
of how its removal could help reduce vehicular dominance, alleviate
congestion, and enhance conditions for walking and cycling. The
assessment must also evaluate the existing roundabout’s role
as a barrier to active travel and explore the benefits of its
reconfiguration or removal, in consultation with TfL and other
relevant stakeholders.
Condition 62 (Community Use Management Plan)
- Add additional
requirement to read:
h. Proposed opening hours for
community use of the Pavilion building, demonstrating how these
have been informed by local community needs and ensuring
flexibility to accommodate evening and weekend activities. The
hours should enable broad and inclusive access, particularly for
working individuals, families, and community groups requiring
out-of-hours use, subject to any necessary management or
safeguarding arrangements.
That the Assistant Director
(Planning & Building Control) be authorised to:
(i) Make
any minor changes to the detailed wording of the recommended
conditions as set out in the report (Appendix 2), its addendums and
the minutes of this Planning Board meeting, where the Assistant
Director (Planning & Building Control) considers it
appropriate, before issuing the final decision notice;
(ii) Finalise the detailed terms
of the Section 106 agreement (including appended documents) and
form of the planning obligations as set out in this report (Section
26), its addendums and the minutes of this Planning Board meeting;
and
(iii)
Consider, in the event that the Section 106 Agreement is not
completed within three (3) months of the date of this Planning
Board resolution, whether consent should be refused on the grounds
that the agreement has not been completed within the appropriate
timescale, and that the proposals are unacceptable in the absence
of the recommended planning obligations; and if the Assistant
Director (Planning & Building Control) considers it
appropriate, to determine the application with reasons for refusal
which will include the following:
· In the absence of a legal
agreement to secure the necessary obligations regarding affordable
housing, health infrastructure, transport and highway works,
sustainable transport enhancements, public realm improvements and
employment and training, the development would fail to mitigate its
impact on local services, amenities and infrastructure,
environmental sustainability and open space contrary to Policies
H1, H4, H5, H7, H15, S2, SI 2, SI 3, T1, T2, T4, T9 and DF1 of the
London Plan (2021) and H3, EA(c), E1, CH2, IM1, IM4, IM(a) and
IM(b) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with
Detailed Policies (Adopted July 2014), and the Planning Obligations
(s106) Guidance SPD (July 2015).
Related Meeting
Planning Board - Tuesday, 17th June, 2025 6.30 pm on June 17, 2025
Supporting Documents
Details
| Outcome | Recommendations Approved |
| Decision date | 17 Jun 2025 |