Content

Notification of decision
following a Licensing Sub-Committee hearing to determine an
application for a premises
licence under section 17 of the Licensing Act
2003
 
PREMISES:   Goan Music Fest Goa Day Bollywood
Festival London, Cranford Community College, High Street, Hounslow,
TW5 9PD (“the Premises”)
 
APPLICANT:  Mr Calvin Barretto
  
TAKE NOTICE
THATON 19 July 2023 following a
hearing before the Licensing and General Purposes Sub-Committee
(the “Licensing Panel” or
“Panel”),
 
HOUNSLOW COUNCIL,
as the Licensing Authority for the Premises
RESOLVED that:
 
the
application for a Premises Licence for Goan Music Fest Goa Day Bollywood Festival London,
Cranford Community College, High Street, Hounslow, TW5 9PD
was GRANTED as follows:
 
Live Music
outdoors:
Friday, Saturday and Sunday 12:00 to
21:30
 
Supply of
alcohol for consumption on the premises:
Friday, Saturday and Sunday 12:00 to
20:30
 
Hours
premises are open to the public:
Friday, Saturday and Sunday 11:00 to
22:00
 
And with
the following conditions that comprise the conditions offered in
the application as amended or added to by the conditions agreed
between the Applicant and the Police, the Applicant and the
Licensing Enforcement Team, the Applicant and the Pollutions Team
and as amended by the Licensing Panel in order
to clarify the conditions and ensure their
enforceability:
 
 
1.   
The Premises Licence Holder will undertake a full
and detailed consultation with each of the responsible authorities.
This consultation will take place through a Multi-Agency Planning
Group, the Safety Advisory Group (SAG), chaired by the London
Borough of Hounslow in the lead up to the event.

 
2.   
An initial Event Safety Management Plan (ESMP)
(first draft) shall be made available to the Licensing Authority at
least 90 days prior to the commencement of the event period that
will include any additional information or improvements identified
and agreed from the previous event’s multi-agency
debrief.
 
3.   
The ESMP shall contain detailed proposals for each
event in policies and plans to promote all the licensing objectives
of public safety, prevention of crime disorder, prevention of
public nuisance, protection of children from harm.
The ESMP shall be made up of the following
documentation, separated into specific chapters covering the
proposed plan and control measures for the event:
 
 
·      
Alcohol and Drug Management Plan; Command, Control
and Communications Plan;
·      
Fire Safety Management Plan;
·      
Major Incident Plan;
·      
Medical and Welfare Plan for members of the public
attending the event and staff working at the event;
·      
Noise Management Plan;
·      
Sanitary Facilities Plan;
·      
Security and Stewarding Operational Plan;
·      
Site Plan; Ticket and Entry Policy;
·      
Trader Information Management Plan;
·      
Traffic and Transport Management Plan;
·      
Waste Management Plan;
·      
Water Supply Plan;
·      
Adverse Weather Plan;
·      
Schedule of Key Dates. Crowd Management Plan (To
include Crime Prevention/Reduction, Crowd Dynamics and Ticket and
Entry Policy
 
4.   
A final ESMP shall be made available to the
Licensing Authority and Responsible Authorities no less than 28
days before the start of the event period. The contents of the
ESMP shall be fully complied with, which shall convert to a
condition of the Licence on receipt of the approval in writing from
the Licensing Authority.
 
5.   
No major changes will be made to the ESMP, any minor
changes will be regularly updated to the local authority as soon as
possible. Following the circulation of the draft ESMPs, the
Premises Licence Holder, or an agent on behalf of and under the
authority of the Premises Licence Holder, shall consult with all
responsible authorities and shall take due account of any
representations made by a responsible authority regarding the
content of the ESMP documents.

 
6.   
The Premises Licence Holder, or their appointed
representative, shall present, by oral and written presentation,
the draft ESMPs to the London Borough of Hounslow’s Advisory
Group no later than three months prior to the date of the event.
Following this presentation a second
presentation shall be organised and take place no later than six
weeks prior to the date of the event whereby the Premises Licence
Holder, or their appointed representative shall present, by oral
and written presentation, the final versions of the ESMPs to the
London Borough of Hounslow’s Safety Advisory
Group.
 
7.   
The maximum accommodation figure (members of the
public) at any one time shall not exceed 15,000 (this doesn’t
include staff).
 
8.   
In accordance with the ticket sales and the Purple
Guide for event safety and management, there shall be one trained
SIA staff member per 100 members of the public to be present during
the entire event and the event organiser shall consistently risk
assess the event and increase this number if required. SIA will be
a mixture of male and female trained staff.
 
9.   
A designated smoking area shall be provided within
the grounds of the event therefore, if any guest leaves the
Premises to smoke they will be refused
re-entry. Signs explaining this will be placed at all Entry and
Exit points.

 
10.A full search
will be conducted by trained SIA staff of all guests which will
include all bags, vehicles, a pat-down search and metal wanding
at the entrance of the Premises.

 
11.Last entry to the
event will be 1900hrs and a no re-entry policy will be in
place.

 
12.No drinks sold or
served are to be in any glass container.

 
13.Any item seized
by event staff will be safely sealed and reported and handed over
to police on the day. Suspects where possible will be detained
pending police arrival.

 
14.The Premises will
not supply any beer, lager or cider with
a strength above 5.5% ABV.

 
15.The event
organiser will provide a written agreement with Hackney carriages
who will provide transport for guests to and from the
event.

 
16.A dispersal
policy will be put in place and risk assessed by the event
organiser.

 
17.Clear signage
will be in place around the event stating that no alcohol will be
served after 20:30hrs regardless of any queues at the
bar.

 
18.No alcohol
purchased at the said Premises will be permitted to be taken
outside the area covered by this Premises Licence in closed or open
containers.

 
19.Notices will be
placed around the Premises requesting that patrons leave the
Premises in a quiet and orderly manner, so not to disturb
local residents.

 
20.A Challenge 25
proof of age scheme shall operate at the Premises. Signage shall be
displayed advising customers that the scheme is in
place.

 
21.All staff
authorised to sell alcohol will be trained in the Challenge 25
scheme and this training will be documented to include the date the
training was given, the name of the person who gave the training,
the person who received the training and signatures by both trainer
and trainee.

 
22.Posters shall be
displayed in prominent positions advising customers of the Proof of
Age policy in force at the Premises.
 
23.The Applicant
will employ a suitably qualified acoustic consultant to produce a
Noise Management Plan for the event and to monitor noise levels
throughout the event.
 
24.The Event
Organiser will submit a Noise Management Plan at least 90 days
prior for approval by Environmental Protection.
 
25.The control
limits set at the mixer position shall be adequate to ensure that
the Music Noise Level shall not at any noise sensitive premises
exceed (75)dB(LAeq) over a fifteen minute period throughout the duration of the
event.
 
26.The control
limits set at the mixer position shall be adequate to ensure that
the 63Hz and 125Hz octave frequency bands do not exceed 75dB
throughout the duration of the event.
 
27.The Event
Organiser shall have full control over the sound amplification
equipment and the volume shall be adjusted according to the
requirements of the Environmental Protection Team.
 
28.Unrestricted
access to the front of house position and backstage areas shall be
allowed at all times to the Responsible
Authority for Environmental Protection for the purpose of sound
level measurements, communications with the nominated noise
consultant / sound engineer and monitoring licence
conditions.
 
29.All complaints
about noise received by the site office/event organiser shall be
logged and shall be notified to the Environmental Protection Team
as soon as reasonably practical of the complaint being received by
calling the duty phone on “020 8583 4141”
 
30.Event
information, including but not limited to when sound checks may be
conducted, the times of the performances and a complaints hotline
number will be communicated to all residents and businesses at
least four weeks prior to the first day of the event located within
400 metres radius from the stage position.
 
31.The events will
be held over Friday, Saturday and Sunday comprising the last
weekend of July 2024 and the first weekend of August 2024
only.
 
32.The events shall
be limited to the year of 2024 only.
 
33.The Applicant is
to make use of specific pick-up points for taxi and ride hailing
apps using geocache services.
 
 
REASONS:
 
The Licensing Panel convened in
person on 19 July 2023 to determine an application for a Premises
Licence for Goan Music Fest Goa Day
Bollywood Festival London, Cranford Community College, High Street,
Hounslow, TW5 9PD (“the
“Premises”) made under the Licensing Act
2003.  The Premises are
currently licensed under Cranford Community College. However, the
applicant also has a one-off Premises Licence for the Premises for
the 26th & 27th August 2023, granted by the Panel on 10th
January 2023.
 
The Licensing Panel carefully
considered all the relevant information including:
 

·      
Written and oral representations made by all the
parties

·      
The Licensing Act 2003 and the steps appropriate to
promote the Licensing Objectives

·      
The guidance issued under section 182 of the
Licensing Act 2003

·      
Hounslow Council’s licensing policy

·      
The Human Rights Act 1998
 
The application, which is shown as Appendix A to
the Agenda, seeks to license the Premises for the provision of
alcohol on the Premises and for live music outdoors (the
application mistakenly refers to the provision of music both
outdoors and “indoors” but the proposed event will
be outside in the grounds of Cranford Community College) and the
area of the Premises shown edged red on page 26 of the Agenda.
The Applicant added
for clarification during the hearing that there would be no
recorded music and no performance of dance.
 
During the consultation process one representation was received
from a local resident (“the Objector”), which is
shown in full in Appendix B. The representation raised issues
predominantly around public nuisance, referring to increased
traffic (referencing last year’s event), increased pollution
and noise nuisance for her and her children.  The Objector also raised concerns about the event
being over three days and concerns as to the number of attendees
and whether there would be enough security to handle this amount of
people.
 
The Applicant’s response to the representation from the
Objector is shown at Appendix B1. In his response the Applicant
disagreed with the Objector’s comments and suggested that the
event does not create traffic impact and
pollution.
 
The Police, Licensing Enforcement and Pollution Teams all
separately agreed proposed conditions with the Applicant. The email
correspondence and conditions are shown in full at Appendix C of
the agenda.
 
The Applicant appeared in person, accompanied by his
colleague.  The objector did not
attend.
 
The Applicant confirmed that
this was an outdoor event, and therefore where the application
referred to the provision of live music “indoors” this
should instead be “outdoors.” The Applicant stated they
were experienced event organisers and had organised this event
successfully for the last 8 years. The Applicant stated that they
welcomed representations and would be happy to discuss any issues
raised, however, the representation appeared to be from the same
household each time they put in an application for the licence.
They continued to work with residents and a lot of the residents
now attended this event. They were aware there may be issues with
other events at this venue but felt that any issues they had for
this event, they resolved and continued to learn and put better
measures in place. The Panel was also told that they tried to
promote different diversity seeking to add local singers and bands
to the event. The Applicant was also looking to work with Arts
Council England for the event with BBC Asian Network likely to also
attend. There would also be fairground rides and food stalls at the
event.
 
The Panel sought clarification
as to the dates the events were to be held and what was being
applied for. The Applicant confirmed that they intended to hold two
events, one on the last weekend of July and the other on the first
weekend of August over Friday, Saturday
and Sunday accordingly (total of 6 days over two consecutive
weekends). The Applicant stated that specific dates had not been
provided because this was an application for a continuous licence
each year and the exact dates would accordingly change each
year.
 
In response to a query from the
Panel as to whether drinking from 12:00 on a Friday was necessary
the Applicant stated that from past events, they know that people
actually tended to come from 3pm onwards
and only a handful arrived before this time. They would have to
open early as some traders wanted to come early but generally the
busiest period was between 3-6pm.
 
The Applicant went on to state
that although the licence applied for was for up to 15,000 people
per event day, realistically they were expecting 8,000 to 10,000
but that this may grow in future years. In discussing this, the
Panel raised concerns as to how the Applicant would manage such a
large crowd and the effect of this on traffic given there is only a
small road outside the Premises. The Applicant was also informed
that the Panel thought his responses to the Objector’s
representation were quite blasé and that they would expect
the Applicant to have some responsibility for the immediate area
outside the Premises too. The Applicant confirmed that they had a
plan in place, for nuisance, they would be announcing to people to
drink responsibly, not to make noise when leaving and to have
stewards to guide people and prevent loitering. Drinks were also
not allowed to be taken outside the area of the Premises and there
would be stewards on the road to better manage the area. The Panel
were also told that the Applicant had experience in managing events
of 100,000 people. The Applicant advised the Panel that they had a
contingency plan in place for security numbers and that depending
on the number of ticket sales, they would increase the number of
SIA security at the event and that this additional security would
be on standby. Additionally, the Applicant had worked with the
Police to increase the proposed number of SIA security from 50 to
75. Moreover, in addition to the security they would have stewards
and volunteers to assist too.
 
The Panel was informed the
event would be ticketed and so attendee numbers would be controlled
in that way. When tickets are sold, the Applicant sends the
FAQ’s alongside the tickets and
more details are available on their website in order to educate
people prior to the event and for people to be aware of what was
expected.
 
The Panel also queried how the
Applicant intended to deal with issues of noise nuisance as raised
by the Objector. The Applicant confirmed they had put a plan in
place and continued to work with the relevant authorities. With
reference to the stage, the Applicant explained that the stage
would be slightly tilted in order for
the sound to travel towards the motorway and not towards the
residents. They monitored this last year every 30 minutes and found
it to be successful to prevent noise nuisance.
 
The Applicant further replied
to concerns of potential litter from the event by stating that they
had doubled the number of bins available from previous events and
were using Grundon Waste who were said to be one of the biggest
waste management companies. The event would also only use plastic
bottles and no glass with up to 80% of the products recyclable. The
Applicant added that they would have a cleaning team both on the
day and once the event finished. Given that the events were
proposed to take place over two consecutive weekends, the stage etc
would be left in place over the two weeks. Other items would be
securely stored on site with night security in place.
 
Although the event was said to
be a family friendly event, the Applicant was asked what policies
were in place for the Licensing Objective for the protection of
children from harm. The Applicant confirmed that DBS checks were
carried out on all staff, and that they have procedures in place if
there were any missing children during the event. This would
include making use of the CCTV and shutting all exits. The Panel
also noted the Applicant’s use of the Challenge 25 policy
within the proposed conditions.
 
The Panel sought clarification
of the area within the Premises in which the event was to be held,
as the diagram on page 26 of the agenda was unclear in that
regard.  The Panel was informed the
event would take place outside in the football
grounds/field.
 
In response to concerns of
traffic management, the Applicant confirmed they had an agreement
in place with Hackney carriages. Adding to this, the Applicant
summarised their dispersal policy in which he stated that 30% of
the crowds tended to leave early for transport and that they had
specifically put an earlier time for alcohol sales to end
in order to allow people to calm down
and slowly trickle out of the event as the bar would close. The
Applicant added that signage would also be in place to aid
attendees. Furthermore, they intended to manage this in segments
with stewards giving directions both within the grounds and outside
to attendees leaving. It was suggested that the Applicant could
make use of geocaching in which taxis and hail ride apps were sent
to a specific pick up point rather than
where the user was located. This would ease pressure on the road
and prevent cabs from stopping in the street. The Applicant
confirmed they would be happy to consider this and would enquire
about how this could be implemented. The Applicant also stated that
many attendees made use of public transport or were local to the
event in any case. Last year, only 56 rides were booked and coaches were also used to transport
people.
 
With reference to the
Applicant’s search policy, the Applicant explained that the
main entrance was located closer to the pub/mini roundabout and as
they entered the field area, security would undertake a pat-down of
people and all bags would be checked. They also made use of a
handheld metal detection wand to wave over people. The Panel
considered it would be prudent for all attendees to be scanned with
the handheld detection wand which the Applicant confirmed they
would be happy to consider implementing.
 
With respect to the supply of
alcohol at the Premises, the Panel was told the bar would have CCTV
which would be monitored. Security would also be in place should a
refusal of alcohol sale be required and
that people would be barred from the event if needed. The Applicant
stated they would ensure no alcohol was taken out of the Premises
and that there would be no high-strength beers, lagers or ciders
that exceed 5.5% ABV, although they would have spirits. The Panel
was told that the Applicant may end up bringing a beer company on
board but that in any case they would comply with the relevant
alcohol guidelines.
 
The Panel queried the
Applicant’s reference to a further ‘after party’
event to be held within the Premises. The Applicant was advised by
the Licensing Team that any such event would require a separate
licence or Temporary Event Notice (“TEN”). The
Applicant confirmed he understood this and had previously
accordingly applied for a TEN so was aware that this would be
separate to the current licence being applied for.
 
In response to questions about
CCTV, the Applicant stated they were making use of the Premises
CCTV and their own additional CCTV. The Applicant stated the
recordings would usually be kept for 14 days and that they could
provide to the Police within this time frame if
required.  
 
The Applicant confirmed that
they had agreed conditions as set out within the agenda with the
Police, Licensing Enforcement and the
Pollutions Team. The Panel considered the proposed conditions and
were happy to incorporate these as agreed with some slight
amendments as set out below and save for where conditions were
duplicated The Panel noted the conditions proposed by the Applicant
were broadly identical to those agreed with the Police and the
Licensing Enforcement team. In addition to some typing corrections,
the Police’s and Licensing Enforcement team’s
conditions proposed clarification to the number of attendees by
specifying the 15,000 attendees did not include staff, the number
of SIA security be increased to 75 and that no alcohol be served
after 20:30hrs on each day which was in line with the
application.
 
Whilst the Police had suggested
increasing the number of SIA security staff to 75 from 50, the
Panel were of the opinion that the
Purple Guide for event management and safety ought to be followed
which recommends 1 SIA security per 100 people.  The Panel therefore decided to implement this as a
condition in order to further promote
all four licensing objectives. The Applicant had indicated during
the hearing that this was something he would be happy to
consider.
 
In addition, the Panel resolved
to add the geocaching service for taxis and ride hailing apps to
prevent any public nuisance from traffic flow on the road outside
the premises.
 
Whilst the Applicant may have
agreed conditions with the Police, as the Applicant was informed
during the meeting, it was ultimately up to the Licensing Panel to
decide whether to grant the application and, if conditions were
deemed appropriate to be placed on the licence to satisfy the
licensing objectives, what those conditions should be. The
Licensing Panel noted this event sought to have up to 15,000 people
on each day, which was an increase from previous events and the
event was to be held in August. 
Therefore, there were clear concerns around the prevention of crime
and disorder, public safety, the prevention of public nuisance and
the protection of children from harm, which were sought to be
addressed in the conditions proposed and agreed with the
responsible authorities mentioned above. Issues of crime and
disorder and public nuisance were also raised by the
Objector.
 
With regard
to the application not specifying
which days in each year the event would take place in the future,
the Applicant informed the Panel that this was so the Applicant did
not have to come back every year and that the dates would change
each year, although set to take place the last weekend of July and
the first weekend of August each year. The Panel was concerned that
it was not clear when any future events would take place and given
that this application requested a significant increase in the
number of attendees than previous events they had held at the
Premises, the Panel was minded to limit any licence to 2024 only so
as to give the Applicant a chance to see how the events went and to
address any issues that may arise in a future
application.
 
With reference to the
conditions numbered above and to ensure they read more clearly, the
Panel therefore resolved to remove the word ‘yearly’
from condition numbered 4, to delete the duplicated word
‘regularly’ within condition 5, to delete the
duplicated word ‘the’ within condition numbered 6 and
to amend to ‘suspects’ within condition 13 of the
Applicant’s agreed conditions with the Police and Licensing
Enforcement team.
 
The Panel considered the
Statutory Guidance which states:
 

“2.1       Licensing
authorities should look to the police as the main source of advice
on crime and disorder. They should also seek to involve the local
Community Safety Partnership (CSP).”
 
However, the Panel also noted that under Public safety:

“2.7       Licence holders have
a responsibility to ensure the safety of those using their
premises, as a part of their duties under the 2003 Act. This
concerns the safety of people using the relevant premises rather
than public health which is addressed in other legislation.
Physical safety includes the prevention of accidents and injuries
and other immediate harms that can result from alcohol consumption
such as unconsciousness or alcohol poisoning”
 
The
Panel noted that ultimately it was for a licence holder to ensure
they were operating in compliance with their licence and to propose
measures to promote the licensing objectives and tackle any
issues.
 
Furthermore, the Statutory
Guidance states the following:
“Public Nuisance

2.15      The 2003 Act enables licensing
authorities and responsible authorities, through representations,
to consider what constitutes public nuisance and what is
appropriate to prevent it in terms of conditions attached to
specific premises licences and club premises certificates. It is
therefore important that in considering the promotion of this
licensing objective, licensing authorities and responsible
authorities focus on the effect of the licensable activities at the
specific premises on persons living and working (including those
carrying on business) in the area around the premises which may be
disproportionate and unreasonable. The issues will mainly concern
noise nuisance, light pollution, noxious smells and litter.

 

2.16      Public nuisance
is given a statutory meaning in many pieces of legislation. It is
however not narrowly defined in the 2003 Act and retains its broad
common law meaning. It may include in appropriate circumstances the
reduction of the living and working amenity and environment of
other persons living and working in the area
of the licensed premises. Public nuisance may also arise
as a result of the adverse effects of
artificial light, dust, odour and insects or where its effect is
prejudicial to health.

 

……

 

 

2.19      Where applications have given
rise to representations, any appropriate conditions should normally
focus on the most sensitive periods. For example, the most
sensitive period for people being disturbed by unreasonably loud
music is at night and into the early morning when residents in
adjacent properties may be attempting to go to sleep or are
sleeping. This is why there is still a need for a licence for
performances of live music between 11 pm and 8 am. In certain
circumstances, conditions relating to noise emanating from the
premises may also be appropriate to address any disturbance
anticipated as customers enter and leave.”

 

……

           

2.21      Beyond the
immediate area surrounding the premises, these are matters for the
personal responsibility of individuals under the law. An individual
who engages in anti-social behaviour is accountable in their own right. However, it would be
perfectly reasonable for a licensing authority to impose a
condition, following relevant representations, that requires the
licence holder or club to place signs at the exits from the
building encouraging patrons to be quiet until they leave the area,
or that, if they wish to smoke, to do so at designated places on
the premises instead of outside, and to respect the rights of
people living nearby to a peaceful night.

 

 
The Council’s Statement
of Licensing Policy 2020-2025 (“the Policy”)
states the following:
 
“54.
Each of the four licensing objectives are of equal importance and
therefore each needs to be considered with equal weight.
 
55. The
Council expects applicants to risk assess their proposals and put
forward measures aimed at promoting the licensing
objectives.
 
LP2 The
Four Licensing Objectives
 
1.
Prevention of Crime and Disorder
Whether the
proposal includes satisfactory measures to mitigate any risk of the
proposed operation making an unacceptable contribution to levels of
crime and disorder in the locality.
 
2. Public
Safety
Whether the
necessary and satisfactory risk assessments have been undertaken,
the management procedures put in place and the relevant
certification produced to demonstrate that the public will be kept
safe both within and in close proximity
to the premises.
 
3.
Prevention of Public Nuisance
Whether the
applicant has addressed the potential for nuisance arising from the
characteristics and style of the proposed activity and identified
the appropriate steps to reduce the risk of public nuisance
occurring.
 
4.
Protection of Children form Harm
Whether the
applicant has identified and addressed any risks with the aim of
protecting children from harm when on the premises or in close proximity to the
premises.”
 
 
At 2.8 of the Policy, it
states:
 
“70.
The Council is aware of the popularity of external areas and
outdoor events. These include beer gardens, terraces, street
parties, events in car parks and industrial spaces, pop-ups or
activity on private land awaiting development. These activities can
further add to Hounslow’s rich cultural heritage, diversity
and help bring our communities together.
 
71.
Hounslow Council already holds premises licences which authorise
regulated entertainment in several of its parks and open spaces.
These licences have been granted with control measures attached,
including limited hours of activity, restricted numbers of events
annually and other steps appropriate for the promotion of the
licensing objectives. These are further supported by the work of
the Events Team where the events take place on Hounslow owned or
operated land.
 
72.
However, by their very nature, outdoor activity can often be the
source of nuisance as a result of noise
and disturbance. The Licensing Authority will expect applicants
and/or premises users to have assessed the impact that any proposed
external areas or outdoor activity may have on any of the licensing
objectives and identify the measures they will put in place to
mitigate this impact.”
 
The Licensing Panel therefore
decided to GRANT the application for a Premises Licence,
amended to reflect the licence for the provision of live music is
“outdoors” and with the conditions as set out above
being those agreed with the Police, Licensing Enforcement
Team and Pollutions Team in addition to
those which the Panel sought to add. Although predominantly
similar, the conditions offered by the Police and Licensing
Enforcement Team were preferred to those offered by the Applicant
as they provided further clarity. The full list of amalgamated and
amended conditions to be added to the Premises Licence is set out
at the beginning of this Decision. Overall the Panel was satisfied that these
conditions would go some way to preventing issues and promoting the
licensing objectives.
 
The Panel would like to remind
the Applicant that a breach of the licence times and conditions
could result in a review of the Premises Licence, and potential
modification of the conditions and even a revocation of the
Premises Licence.
 
 
Right to Appeal
 
Any
party aggrieved with the decision of the Licensing Sub-Committee on
one or more grounds set out
in schedule 5 of Licensing
Act 2003 may appeal to the local Magistrate’s Court within 21
days of notification of this decision.