Content

Notification of decision
following a Licensing Sub-Committee hearing to determine an
application for the grant of a Premises
Licence under section 17 of the Licensing Act
2003
 
PREMISES:   Kingsley Local, 4 Kingsley Road, Hounslow,
TW3 1NP (“the Premises”)
 
APPLICANT:  Kinsley Super Store LTD
(“the Applicant”)
 
TAKE NOTICE
THATON 22 May 2023 following a
hearing before the Licensing and General Purposes Sub-Committee
(the “Licensing Panel” or
“Panel”),
 
HOUNSLOW COUNCIL,
as the Licensing Authority for the Premises
RESOLVED that:
 
the
application for the grant of a Premises Licence for Kingsley
Local, 4 Kingsley Road, Hounslow, TW3
1NP was GRANTED subject to the
modifications and conditions stated below.
 
REASONS:
 
The Panel convened to determine
an application for the grant of a Premises Licence for Kingsley
Local, 4 Kingsley Road, Hounslow, England,
TW3 1NP made under the Licensing Act 2003. 
 
The Applicant applied for the
following licensable activities:
 
·      
Supply of alcohol for consumption off the
premises:

Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 23:00

 
·      
Hours premises are open to the
public:

Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 23:00
 
A copy of the application was attached as
Appendix A (pages 15 to 30) of the agenda pack.
 
The Premises were not currently
licensed.  
 
The Premises are situated in an
area of mixed commercial and residential properties.  The Premises are located within the Cumulative
Impact Policy (“CIP”) area for Hounslow and North West
Isleworth.
 
The hearing was held in-person.
The Panel consisted of three members. 
All members of the Licensing Panel were in attendance throughout
the hearing, and during deliberation which took place separately in
a closed session.
 
The Licensing Panel carefully
considered all the relevant information including:
 
·      
Written and Oral representations by all the
parties
·      
The Licensing Act 2003 and the steps
appropriate to promotethe
Licensing Objectives
·      
The guidance issued under section 182 of the
Licensing Act 2003 (“the Statutory
Guidance”)
·      
Hounslow Council’s licensing policy including
the Council’s Cumulative Impact Policy 2020 – 2025
(“the Council’s Policy”)
·      
The Human Rights Act 1998
 
The measures and
conditions the Applicant proposed to include with any licence that
might be granted are set out in the application in Appendix A and
also listed in paragraphs 4.2 to 4.6 (inclusive) (pages 7 to 10) of
the agenda pack.  
 
As part of the
consultation process the Authority received a representation from
Licensing Enforcement which stated that they ‘were happy to
grant the licence as applied for’ but recommended slightly
different hours for the supply of alcohol on the premises (relating
to the Sunday hours) and conditions. The written representation is
shown as Appendix C (pages 4 to 35) of the agenda
pack
 
The Authority
also received two representations from local residents/businesses
(“the Objectors”) concerned with a possible increase in
public nuisance, street drinking, antisocial behaviour and the
potential effect on the environment and services such as the police
and licensing enforcement. The second representation also included
a petition which noted 110 names and signatures. The written
representations are shown as Appendix B (pages 31-33) of the
agenda pack.
 
There were no
representations from the police opposing the
application.
 
A copy of the
report and all representations received were sent to the
Applicant.
 
During the
Licensing Panel hearing the facts giving rise to the application
for the grant of a Premises Licence were set out by the licensing
officer and were agreed by all the parties in
attendance.
 
The Applicant
attended the hearing and was represented by a Mr
Samaroo.  Mr Charlie Hennessy, Licensing
Enforcement Officer, attended the hearing. One of the Objectors
also attended and was represented by a Mr
Panchal.
 
Submissions by the Applicant and
Objectors
 
Mr Samaroo first clarified any possible confusion caused by the
name and Premises address, the Premises is 4 Kingsley Road, however
the company operating from the premises was called Kinsley Super
Store LTD, who were also the Applicant.
 
During the hearing Mr Samaroo explained that the Applicant acknowledged that the Premises was
within the Cumulative Impact Area (“CIA”) but that the
Applicant had carefully considered the Council’s Policy and
adopted most of the recommendations and conditions applicable in
order to mitigate the concerns from the Cumulative Impact
Assessment.
 
Mr. Samaroo also made reference
to the petition attached with the Objector’s representation
stating that he had called 5 or 6 of the signees of the petition
and found that whilst some were knowledgeable about the application
being sought and the reason for refusal, some were not fully aware
of what was actually being sought and proposed by the Applicant in
seeking a Premises Licence. He went on to add that although it was
a new business, the Applicant was not seeking to add to any
existing issues by selling to street drinkers (being an issue
identified within the Council’s Policy) and in fact did not
want these types of customers which created a negative impact.
Accordingly the Applicant had proposed within the application to
attempt to limit this by ensuring no more than 20% of the sales
area shall be used at any one time for the sale, exposure for sale
or display of alcohol. Furthermore, the Applicant had also proposed
a condition to not sell any ‘super strength beers, lagers,
ciders or spirit mixtures of 5.5% ABV (Alcohol by volume) or above.
The Applicant also sought to provide other services including a
newsagent and mobile phone repairs counter stating there were many
other reasons for people to come into the shop but acknowledged
alcohol sales was an important aspect of the business
too.
 
Mr Samaroo also suggested that
the representation from the Objector in attendance was only the
basis of being a competing business also selling
alcohol.
 
Mr Hennessy reiterated his
written submission that the Licensing Enforcement did not have any
objection to the application but had recommended that the Supply of
Alcohol be adjusted to 10:00 to 22:30 for Sundays in order to fall
in line with core hours recommended within the Council’s
Policy. Mr Hennessy also stated that the submission included
suggested conditions which they would seek to incorporate if the
Licence was granted which mirror those set out by the Applicant
within Application.
 
The Applicant confirmed that
they would be happy to accept the proposed hours and conditions set
out within Mr Hennessy’s representation.
 
Mr Hennessy queried whether
some of the suggested conditions from the Applicant within the
operating procedure of the Application would still be fulfilled
given some would be difficult to enforce. For example, the proposed
condition whereby the licensee would report to Trading standards
any instances of a caller to the shop attempting to sell alcohol or
tobacco products. Mr Samaroo confirmed the Applicant would still
implement these and that the Applicant had carefully prepared the
operating schedule and proposed the conditions to be robust to
tackle any such issues.
 
The Panel sought to clarify the
condition regarding the sale of alcohol of 5.5% ABV as they
identified this to be a common issue with street drinkers seeking
high ABV alcohol. The Applicant confirmed that this was one of the
model conditions within the Council’s policy and to assist,
Mr Hennessy read the condition proposed stating:
 
“No Super-strength, beers, lagers ciders or spirit
mixtures of 5.5% ABV (Alcohol by volume) or above shall be sold at
the premises, except for premium beers and ciders supplied in glass
bottles.”
 
Mr Panchal, representing the
Objector, sought to clarify the comments from the Applicant stating
that he thought it was wrong to suggest the signees of the petition
were not aware of what they were signing because the first page
clearly showed the basis for the petition. Mr Panchal questioned
the Applicant’s knowledge of the Licensing Objectives and
went on to suggest that the Applicant as the Designated Premises
Supervisor did not have the required knowledge of the Licensing
Objectives. Mr Panchal was concerned that this demonstrated a lack
of understanding of how the Licensing Objectives were to be met and
promoted. Moreover, Mr Panchal queried whether the intention to
restrict the sales area of alcohol as per the proposed condition to
20% was demonstrated sufficiently on the map provided within the
application. The Panel noted this but considered the map to be
clear.
 
Mr Panchal also queried whether
the Licensing Enforcement team would seek to suggest reducing the
proposed hours to prevent the possible effect on the licensing
objectives. Mr Hennessy of the Licensing Enforcement team noted Mr
Panchal’s query but added that the hours proposed within the
representation were in line with the Council’s Policy
regarding core hours and to further reduce the hours beyond this
would not be fair to the Applicant.   
 
The
Panel noted that no representation was put in by the
police.
 
The
Panel queried whether the Objector was a competitor to the
Applicant and considered whether the representation was
‘vexatious or frivolous’ under the Statutory
Guidance.
 
The
Statutory Guidance states:
 
9.4
       A
representation is “relevant” if it relates to the
likely effect of the grant of the licence on the promotion of at
least one of the licensing objectives. For example, a
representation from a local businessperson about the commercial
damage caused by competition from new licensed premises would not
be relevant. On the other hand, a representation by a
businessperson that nuisance caused by new premises would deter
customers from entering the local area, and the steps proposed by
the applicant to prevent that nuisance were inadequate, would be
relevant. In other words, representations should relate to the
impact of licensable activities carried on from premises on the
objectives…
 
…
 
9.5
       It is
for the licensing authority to determine whether a representation
(other than a representation from responsible authority) is
frivolous or vexatious on the basis of what might ordinarily be
considered to be vexatious or frivolous. A representation may be
considered to be vexatious if it appears to be intended to cause
aggravation or annoyance, whether to a competitor or other person,
without reasonable cause or justification. Vexatious circumstances
may arise because of disputes between rival businesses and local
knowledge will therefore be invaluable in considering such matters.
Licensing authorities can consider the main effect of the
representation, and whether any inconvenience or expense caused by
it could reasonably be considered to be proportionate.
 
 
In considering the above, the
Panel were not able to verify the connection with the Objector and
were in any case aware that the reasoning provided for the
objections within the written representations were issues which had
been identified within the Cumulative Impact Assessment of the
Council’s Policy and within the other Objector’s
representation and so relevant.
 
In summing up, Mr Panchal
highlighted that it was only a presumption that the Applicant would
understand and be able to comply with the licensing objectives. He
stated he had not heard anything to suggest the four licensing
objectives would be promoted and therefore was not confident that
the Applicant would be able to implement or promote these. Mr
Panchal suggested that the Premises Licence should not be granted
and should only be granted once the Applicant was able to
demonstrate understanding and compliance with the Licensing
objectives.
 
Mr Samaroo emphasised that the
Applicant had provided a robust and comprehensive operating
procedure that covered both the licensing objectives and was
sufficient to rebut the presumption/be an exception to the policy
operating within the CIA.
 
 
Statutory Guidance
 
The Panel considered the
Statutory Guidance further which states:
 

“2.1    Licensing authorities should
look to the police as the main source of advice on crime and
disorder. They should also seek to involve the local Community
Safety Partnership (CSP).”
 
Furthermore, the Statutory
Guidance states the following:
 
“Public Nuisance

2.15      The 2003 Act enables licensing
authorities and responsible authorities, through representations,
to consider what constitutes public nuisance and what is
appropriate to prevent it in terms of conditions attached to
specific premises licences and club premises certificates. It is
therefore important that in considering the promotion of this
licensing objective, licensing authorities and responsible
authorities focus on the effect of the licensable activities at the
specific premises on persons living and working (including those
carrying on business) in the area around the premises which may be
disproportionate and unreasonable. The issues will mainly concern
noise nuisance, light pollution, noxious smells and
litter.

……..

 

2.16      Public nuisance
is given a statutory meaning in many pieces of legislation. It is
however not narrowly defined in the 2003 Act and retains its broad
common law meaning. It may include in appropriate circumstances the
reduction of the living and working amenity and environment of
other persons living and working in the area of the licensed
premises. Public nuisance may also arise as a result of the adverse
effects of artificial light, dust, odour and insects or where its
effect is prejudicial to health.

…….
 

2.19      Where applications have given
rise to representations, any appropriate conditions should normally
focus on the most sensitive periods. For example, the most
sensitive period for people being disturbed by unreasonably loud
music is at night and into the early morning when residents in
adjacent properties may be attempting to go to sleep or are
sleeping. This is why there is still a need for a licence for
performances of live music between 11 pm and 8 am. In certain
circumstances, conditions relating to noise emanating from the
premises may also be appropriate to address any disturbance
anticipated as customers enter and leave.”

……

           

2.21      Beyond the
immediate area surrounding the premises, these are matters for the
personal responsibility of individuals under the law. An individual
who engages in anti-social behaviour is accountable in their own
right. However, it would be perfectly reasonable for a licensing
authority to impose a condition, following relevant
representations, that requires the licence holder or club to place
signs at the exits from the building encouraging patrons to be
quiet until they leave the area, or that, if they wish to smoke, to
do so at designated places on the premises instead of outside, and
to respect the rights of people living nearby to a peaceful
night.
 

The Council’s Licensing Policy 2020-2025
 
The Council’s Statement
on Licensing Policy 2020-2025 (“the Policy”)
states the following:
 
“54. Each of the
four licensing objectives are of equal importance and therefore
each needs to be considered with equal weight.
 
55. The Council expects
applicants to risk assess their proposals and put forward measures
aimed at promoting the licensing objectives.
 
LP2 The
Four Licensing Objectives
 
1.
Prevention of Crime and Disorder
Whether the
proposal includes satisfactory measures to mitigate any risk of the
proposed operation making an unacceptable contribution to levels of
crime and disorder in the locality.
 
2. Public
Safety
Whether the
necessary and satisfactory risk assessments have been undertaken,
the management procedures put in place and the relevant
certification produced to demonstrate that the public will be kept
safe both within and in close proximity to the premises.
 
3.
Prevention of Public Nuisance
Whether the
applicant has addressed the potential for nuisance arising from the
characteristics and style of the proposed activity and identified
the appropriate steps to reduce the risk of public nuisance
occurring.
 
4.
Protection of Children form Harm
Whether the
applicant has identified and addressed any risks with the aim of
protecting children from harm when on the premises or in close
proximity to the premises.”
 
The Panel noted that ultimately it was for a
licence holder to ensure they were operating in compliance with
their licence and to propose measures to promote the licensing
objectives and tackle any issues.
 
Cumulative Impact Policy (CIP)
 
In relation to the core hours,
the Council’s Policy states that the hours for
licensable activity will generally be authorised subject to the
Applicant demonstrating that they understand the area where the
premises are located and that they will promote the four licensing
objectives.  The core hours are:
 
· Monday
to Thursday 09:00 to 23:00
· Friday
and Saturday 09:00 to 00:00
· Sunday
10:00 to 22:30
 
Furthermore, the current policy
goes on to state that:
 
“Hours may be more restrictive dependent on the
character of the area and if the individual circumstances require
it. Later hours may be considered where the applicant has
identified any risk that may undermine the promotion of the
licensing objectives and has put in place robust measures to
mitigate those risks. It should be noted that this policy does not
apply to those who are making an application within a Cumulative
Impact Area (see section 3) unless they have been able to
demonstrate that the proposed activity or operation of the premises
will not add to the cumulative impact that is already being
experienced.”
 
Off Sales of Alcohol is also
considered at as LP4 of the Council’s Policy which
states:
 
“Hours for the supply of alcohol will generally be
restricted to between 09:00 and 23:00.”
 
However, the Panel noted that given the premises was within the
CIA, paragraph 91 of the Council’s Policy would apply stating
“If an applicant can demonstrate they will not add to the
cumulative impact in their operating schedule and at any hearing,
then the Core Hours Policy within LP3 will
apply”
 
The Panel considered the
Cumulative Impact Assessment forming part of the Council’s
Policy and noted the highlighted issues of street drinking and
alcohol litter with a car park on Kingsley Road being identified as
a hotspot for street drinking.
 
The Council’s Policy also
states:
 
“81. The Council
recognises that in areas where the number, type and density of
premises selling alcohol are high or exceptional, serious problems
of nuisance and disorder may be arising or have begun to arise
outside or some distance from the licensed premises.”
 
However, the Panel were also aware that the Council’s
policy states that, “there is evidence that the Borough
suffers from considerable public nuisance linked to street drinking
and this often takes place early in the morning.” Given
the hours proposed fell within the core hours and not in the early
morning, the Panel did not think the grant of licence would impact
this.
 
In
addition, the Panel noted no representation
was put in by the police despite the suggested issues within this
area of the premises and that as per the Statutory Guidance
above, “Licensing authorities should look to the
police as the main source of advice on crime and
disorder.”
 
The Panel considered the
written representation from Licensing Enforcement Team and was of
the view that they simply wanted the proposed hours to be reduced
to mirror those of the core hours in CIP. The Panel was satisfied
given the only change was to the Sunday hours with Application and
that the Applicant was otherwise agreeable to this and the
recommended conditions from the Licensing Enforcement
Team.   
 
The Applicant had also
suggested within their operating procedure amongst other proposals
that they would place signage to encourage customers to not drink
in the street, to not loiter, respect residents by leaving quietly
and to dispose of litter legally. The operating procedure further
adds that the area immediately outside the premises will be
monitored, swept and kept clean of any rubbish. In accordance with
the Statutory guidance above, beyond the immediate area
surrounding the premises, these are matters for the personal
responsibility of individuals under the law. The
Panel was therefore satisfied that the Applicant was aware of the
issues within the area and the proposed conditions and offer to
accept the conditions set out in the Licensing Enforcement
Team’s representation would also go some way to addressing
any public nuisance issues.
 
The Panel was of the view that
the extensive conditions proposed to be added to any licence and
the reduced hours for Sunday meant it was unlikely there would be a
negative impact on one or more of the licensing objectives and so
could rebut the presumption within the CIP. The Panel considered
that as per the Council’s Policy, the application was to be
considered on its own merits and that the Applicant had given
sufficient consideration to potential cumulative impact issues and
demonstrated the ‘steps they will take to promote the
licensing objectives as well as showing how they will mitigate any
potential negative harms in their
application.’
 
Overall, the Panel was of the
view that any existing problems in the area would not get any worse
by the premises having a Premises Licence within the core hours
sought. The Panel took on board the Applicant’s response and
that the conditions as proposed by Applicant and the Licensing
Enforcement Team were to be attached (as slightly amended) to the
licence to meet the licensing objectives and were
enforceable.
 
Decision
 
Having taken all the
representations into account, the conditions recommended by the
Licensing Enforcement Team, the statutory provisions and the
Revised Guidance issued under section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003
and the Council’s Policy, the Panel were satisfied that the
Applicant would comply with the licensing objectives.
 
The Panel directed that the
conditions as proposed by the Licensing Enforcement Team
(see pages 34 to 35 of the agenda pack)
were to be added to the licence along with the
proposed conditions within the Application (save for any duplicated
or mirrored conditions). In addition, save for condition 7 of the
Licensing Enforcement’s submission, where those conditions
within the Application were slightly varied by the Licensing
Enforcement Team’s proposed conditions, the Licensing
Enforcement Team’s conditions were to take precedence over
the conditions within the Application. The Licensing Enforcement
Team’s conditions are set out as within the Additional
Conditions section below as conditions 1 to 8.
 
The Panel also resolved to
remove Condition 7 of the Licensing Enforcement Team’s
submission which stated ‘Notices shall be
prominently displayed advising patrons, CCTV is in operation within
the premises’ and to replace this with the Applicant’s proposed
condition shown in the Additional Conditions section below as
condition 12.
 
In addition to the above, so as to further
prevent adding to any existing issues of street drinking identified
within the CIA, the Panel resolved to add the following model
conditions identified within the Council’s
Policy.  ‘No single cans or
bottles of beer or cider or spirit mixtures shall be sold at the
premises’ and ‘No miniature bottles of spirits
of 20 cl or below shall be sold from the premises.’
 
The Licensing Panel therefore decided to
GRANT the application for a grant of a Premises Licence
with the following modifications:
 
·      
Supply of alcohol for consumption off the
premises:

- Monday to Saturday
09:00 to 23:00

- Sunday 10:00 to
22:30
 
·      
Hours premises are open to the
public:

- Monday to Sunday
09:00 to 23:00
 
 
Additional Conditions:
 
1.   
The premises shall install and maintain a comprehensive CCTV system
as per the minimum requirements of the Hounslow Police Licensing
Team. All entry and exit points will be covered enabling frontal
identification of every person entering in any light condition. The
CCTV system shall continually record whilst the premises is open
for licensable activities and during all times when customers
remain on the premises. All recordings shall be stored for a
minimum period of 31 days with date and time stamping. Viewing of
recordings shall be made available upon the request of Police or
authorised council officer as soon as possible and during opening
hours.
 
2.   
A staff member from the premises who is conversant with the
operation of the CCTV system shall be on the premises at all times
when the premises are open. This staff member must be able to
provide a Police or authorised council officer copies of recent
CCTV images or data with the absolute minimum of delay when
requested.
 
3.   
All staff responsible for selling alcohol shall receive regular
training in the Licensing Act 2003. Written records of this
training shall be retained and made available to Police and Council
officers with the absolute minimum of delay when requested.
 
4.   
An incident log shall be kept at the premises and made available on
request to an authorised officer of the Hounslow Council or the
Police. It must be completed within 24 hours of the incident and
will record the following:
 
(a) all crimes reported to the
venue
(b) all ejections of patrons
(c) any complaints received concerning
crime and disorder
(d) any incidents of disorder
(e) all seizures of drugs or offensive
weapons
(f) any faults in the CCTV system
(h) any visit by a relevant authority
or emergency service.
 
5.   
Notices shall be prominently displayed at all exits requesting
patrons to respect the needs of local residents and businesses and
leave the area quietly.
 
6.   
A challenge 25 proof of age scheme shall operate at the premises.
Signage shall be displayed advising customers that the scheme is in
place. All staff authorised to sell alcohol will be trained in the
Challenge 25 scheme and this training will be documented to include
the date the training was given, the name of the person who gave
the training, the person who received the training and signatures
by both trainer and trainee.
 
7.   
No Alcohol shall be removed from the premises in open
containers.
 
8.   
No Super-strength, beers, lagers ciders or spirit mixtures of 5.5%
ABV (Alcohol by volume) or above shall be sold at the premises,
except for premium beers and ciders supplied in glass bottles.
 
9.   
In the event that crime or serious disorder is, or appears to have
been, committed on the premises, the management will immediately
ensure that:
 
(a) The police and, where appropriate,
the London Ambulance Service, are called
(b) As far as is safe and reasonably
practicable, all measures will be taken to apprehend any identified
suspects pending the arrival of the police.
(c) As far as is safe and reasonably
practicable, all measures will be taken to preserve any identified
crime scene pending the arrival of the police.
(d) Any and all appropriate measures
are taken to fully protect the safety of all persons always present
on the premises during operating hours.
 
10. A record shall be kept
detailing all refused sales of alcohol. The record should include
the date and time of the refused sale and the name of the member of
staff who refused the sale. The record shall be available for
inspection at the premises by the police or an authorised officer
of Hounslow Council at all times whilst the premises is open.
 
11. The licence holder and staff
will attend any offered Trading Standards training in the sale and
supply of alcohol.
 
12. Notices will be prominently
displayed by the entry/ exit.
 
a) That CCTV is in use & a
Challenge 25 proof of age policy is in operation.
b) Advising customers of the provisions
of the Licensing Act regarding underage & proxy sales.
c) Of the permitted hours for
licensable activities & the opening times of the premises.
d) Not to drink in the street.
e) To respect residents, to leave
quietly, and not to loiter outside the premises or in the vicinity
and to dispose of litter legally.
 
13. No more than 20% of the sales
area shall be used at any one time for the sale, exposure for sale,
or display of alcohol.
 
14. No collections of waste or
recycling materials (including bottles) from the premises shall
take place between 08:00 and 20:00 on the following day.

15. Notices will be displayed at
the entrance informing that No beers are available above 5.5% ABV
Prominent signage indicating the permitted hours for the sale of
alcohol shall be displayed so as to be visible before entering the
premises, where alcohol is on public display, and at the point of
sale.
 
16. A stock control system will be
operated, so that the licensee can quickly identify where and when
alcoholic goods or tobacco products have been purchased. Invoices
[or copies] for all alcoholic goods or tobacco products on the
premises will be kept at the shop and made available to officers
from the council, police or HMRC upon request.

17. An ultra-violet light will be
available at the premises for the purpose of checking the UK Duty
Stamp on spirits as soon as practical after they have been
purchased.
 
18. If any spirits bought by the
business have UK Duty Stamps that do not fluoresce under
ultraviolet light, or are otherwise suspicious, the licensee shall
identify the supplier to Sutton Trading Standards and HMRC as soon
as possible.

19. No alcoholic goods
or tobacco products will ever be purchased or taken from sellers
calling to the shop.

20. The licensee will immediately
report to Trading Standards any instance of a caller to the shop
attempting to sell alcohol or tobacco products.

21. The installed digital CCTV
system will record for 31 days all public areas of the premises
which will monitor all public safety issues. The DPS will be
responsible to carry out a fire and health and safety risk
assessments for licensed premises all notices in relation to public
health and safety will be displayed.
 
22. The DPS will ensure that the
premises operates in line with existing health and safety
legislation and is aware that it is also the responsibility of the
premises licence holder that this legislation is adhered to.
 
23. The DPS and/or the Premises
Licence holder are responsible for ensuring that the premises do
not cause any nuisance to the local residents, other business
operators or the general public. They will monitor the external
areas of the premises in relation to public nuisance or antisocial
behaviour.
 
24. Any antisocial behaviour CCTV
recordings will be made available to the police and environmental
health officers.
 
25. All alcohol to
be labelled with the name of the premises for clear identification
as to place of purchase by any Responsible authority.

26. A
personal licence holder shall be present on the premises and
supervise the sale of alcohol, throughout the permitted hours for
the sale of alcohol.
 

27. Customers shall be discouraged from congregating outside the
premises.
 

28. The
area immediately outside of the premises will be monitored, swept
and kept clean of any rubbish.
 

29.No single cans or
bottles of beer or cider or spirit mixtures shall be sold at the
premises.
 

30.No miniature bottles of spirits
of 20 cl or below shall be sold from the
premises.
 
 
The Panel would like to remind
the Applicant that a breach of the licensed times and conditions
could result in a review of the Premises Licence, and potential
modification of the conditions and even a revocation of the
Premises Licence.
 
Right to Appeal
 
Any
party aggrieved with the decision of the Licensing Sub-Committee on
one or more grounds set out
in schedule 5 of Licensing
Act 2003 may appeal to the local Magistrate’s Court within 21
days of notification of this decision.