Content

Application 858M northern section
 
Councillor Mike Caswell proposed the
officer’s recommendations, which were seconded by Councillor
Philip Ham.
 
Having been duly proposed and seconded, the
Strategic Planning Committee resolved that:
·      
the part of the application 858M which sought to upgrade part of
footpath WN23/40 to a bridleway from points A1 to A2 to A3 and add
a bridleway from points A3 to B, as shown on Appendix 1 to the
officer’s report, be refused
·      
an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the
Definitive Map and Statement to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/40
from points A to A1 to a restricted byway, to add a restricted
byway from points A1 to I to G to B and to upgrade part of footpath
WN 23/38 from points B to C to a restricted byway as shown on
Appendix 1.
·      
an Order be made to amend the Definitive Statement to record
footpath WN 23/40 as running from points X to A3 to A2 to A1 as
shown on Appendix 1.
 
(Vote – 9
For, 2 Against)
 
Application 859
 
Councillor Mike Caswell proposed the
recommendations, which were seconded by Councillor Edric Hobbs.
 
Having been duly proposed and seconded, the
Strategic Planning Committee resolved that:

·      
the part of the application which sought to upgrade footpath WN
23/12 from points CE2 to CE3 to CE4 to a bridleway, as shown on
Appendix 1, be refused.

·      
an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the
Definitive Map and Statement to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/38,
from points C to CE1 to CE2 to a restricted byway, as shown on
Appendix 1.

·      
an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the
Definitive Map and Statement to add a footpath from points CE4 to
E2, as shown on Appendix 1.

·      
an Order be made, the effect of which would be to amend the
Definitive Map and Statement to upgrade part of footpath WN 23/12
from points CE4 to CE5 to a restricted byway and to add a
restricted byway from points CE5 to point E, as shown on Appendix
1.
 
 
(Vote –
Unanimous)