Decision Maker:

Outcome: Refused

Is Key Decision?: No

Is Callable In?: No

Date of Decision: September 1, 2025

Purpose:

Content: The decision   The Licensing sub-committee, in considering this decision from the information presented to it within the report and at the hearing, has determined that having regard to the promotion of the licensing objectives: ·  The prevention of crime and disorder; ·  Public safety; ·  Prevention of public nuisance; and ·  The protection of children from harm   And in particular upon consideration of the objection notice given by the Metropolitan Police is satisfied that the proposed event would undermine the licensing objectives. Therefore, the Sub-Committee has served a counter notice.   Reasons for the decision   The Licensing Sub-Committee took into consideration the objection received from the Metropolitan Police (“the Police”) to the Temporary Event Notice for the period on 06/09/2025 from 00:01 finishing on 07/09/2025 at 03:00.   The Sub-Committee took into account the Police’s representations regarding alleged breaches on 23rd and 24th August 2025 in the Rivington Street area. The Sub-Committee heard that Police witnessed the premises operating at 02:45 under a Temporary Event Notice which specifically described the event as featuring live performers and that all conditions would be followed in line with the premises licence. However, the Police found the front doors were open with considerable noise escaping. The music was being played by DJ’s.   The Sub-Committee heard allegations that this was not the first time that these failures have been observed at the premises, and this has been documented in previous warning letters, objection emails and in meetings with the Premises User.   The Sub-Committee took into consideration representations from the Police about the open front doors, excessive noise, and more than 30 people standing outside in excess of the stipulated eight-person smoking area limit. The Police stated that these issues have been documented, and despite assurances from the premises that it would not happen again, it consistently has. The Police made representations that the Police are no longer willing to support any extension of hours until the premises demonstrate that the premises can operate within its current licensed hours.   The Sub-Committee heard from the Police that if music can be heard in the street, it constitutes a noise nuisance regardless of specific conditions. The Police also confirmed that the premises sound-limiting device did not seem to be working effectively, as evidenced by noise complaints from neighbouring premises. The Police made representations that the premises failed to comply with the requirements under the alfresco trial. The Police witnessed 30 people were observed standing outside with drinks during times outside the trial hours, despite conditions requiring all patrons to be seated.   The Sub-Committee took into consideration the Premises Users representations that they have hosted hundreds of events with no issues and very few neighbour complaints, despite acknowledging some initial errors, especially concerning the alfresco dining. The Premises User made representations that they are a young, growing brand trying to promote their business, and have always adapted to feedback after meetings with the Police.   The Sub-Committee took into account the Police concerns about the operation of the premises that would undermine the licensing objectives and would have an impact on the area if the event was permitted.   The Sub-Committee felt the Police evidence was strong on why this temporary event should not take place. The Sub-Committee therefore considered that allowing this event to take place in accordance with the Temporary Event Notice would undermine the licensing objectives. The Sub-Committee decided that it was necessary and proportionate to issue a counter notice.