The Staffordshire Police, Fire and Crime Panel met on Monday 13 April 2026, discussing decisions made by the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner, public questions regarding policing and potential force reorganisation, and reviewing the panel's policies and procedures. Key decisions included the adoption of revised terms of reference and procedures for the panel, and a discussion on the implications of potential national police force restructuring.

Decisions Published by the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner

The panel reviewed two decisions published by the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner (PFCC). The first concerned the purchase and supply of electricity, which the PFCC noted as a national arrangement aimed at achieving better value through joint buying, especially in light of rising energy costs. The PFCC highlighted that this decision, while seemingly dry, has significant budgetary implications, referencing that electricity costs for the previous year were £2.5 million, down from £1.5 million. The second decision related to public perception surveys, which the PFCC deemed crucial for understanding public confidence and priorities for local policing. This survey will utilise social media to gather richer insights from a wider range of people, informing the focus on neighbourhood policing.

Public Questions and Potential Police Force Reorganisation

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to public questions, particularly concerning the potential reduction of police forces in England and Wales from 43 to around 12. Councillor Vince Merrick, speaking on behalf of South Staffordshire, raised concerns about the impact on police visibility in areas like South Staffordshire. The PFCC, David Williams, elaborated on this, expressing concern that such a reorganisation, led by Lord Hogan-Howe, could lead to a loss of local control and accountability. He warned that this could be the end of Staffordshire Police as an independent force, lamenting the potential loss of local focus and the risk of regional forces prioritising high harm and risk over local community needs. Mr. Williams urged local councils to engage with the government on this matter to ensure a balance between national efficiencies and local delivery.

The discussion also touched upon the recruitment of special constables, with a question from Mr. Chris Elliott seeking clarification on ongoing recruitment efforts and difficulties. The PFCC acknowledged that while the force is keen to recruit more specials, modern life presents challenges in juggling jobs and other commitments with the significant time required for the role. He also addressed a question from Mrs. Malanders, deeming her concerns to be outside the remit of the police service and more appropriate for her Member of Parliament.

Review of Panel Policies and Procedures

The panel reviewed and adopted revised policies and procedures following a working group report. This included amendments to the panel's terms of reference, procedure rules, and complaints process. The panel agreed to review these annually and publish them on the panel's web pages. Consideration will also be given to including a statement of mutual respect in the panel members' annual training. The PFCC noted that these updates provide a head start in defining the panel's role, especially in anticipation of potential legislative changes to police, fire, and crime panels.

Motor Vehicle Tax and MOT Report

A report from the Deputy Commissioner regarding motor vehicle tax and MOT issues was presented. The Deputy Commissioner, David Williams, acknowledged an unfortunate incident and a mistake that had occurred, stating that he had stepped down as chair of the Staffordshire Safer Roads Partnership to protect its integrity and maintain public confidence. The Commissioner has since taken up the chair of the partnership, with Vice Chairs appointed from both the City and County Councils. Councillor Anthony Screen, Cabinet Member for Community Safety and Resilience, expressed personal satisfaction with the panel's thorough review of the matter and agreed that the Deputy Commissioner's decision was correct. The panel emphasised the importance of learning from mistakes and upholding high standards.

Road Safety and Enforcement

In response to a question from Mr. Chris Elliott about the protocol for advising drivers on speeding rather than issuing fines, the PFCC explained that police officers have discretion and that education is a key part of the road safety partnership's approach. He highlighted the effectiveness of speed awareness courses and the increased capacity of the roads crime team. The PFCC also indicated an intention to increase enforcement by safety camera vans on roads that cause concern to communities, particularly rat runs and dark villages. The Deputy Commissioner added that volunteer groups, such as community speed watch groups, play a vital role in educating the public about road safety.

Future Meetings and Work Programme

The panel discussed its future meetings and work programme, with a visit to Pyre Hill, the fire headquarters, scheduled for 23 June. The PFCC expressed the importance of this visit for understanding the modernisation of Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service and potential estate efficiencies. The panel also noted the ongoing legislative developments regarding the structure of police forces and their oversight.