Limited support for Elmbridge
We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for Elmbridge Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.
You can still subscribe!
If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.
If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.
If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.
Special, Overview and Scrutiny Committee - Thursday, 14th March, 2024 6.00 pm
March 14, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
The council meeting focused on the scrutiny of a decision to lease the Thames-Ditten Community Centre to a new community interest company (CIC), Vital Village, led by Laura Pring. The discussion centered on the financial implications, the due diligence performed, and the potential community benefits.
Decision: Approval of the Lease to Vital Village The council approved leasing the community center to Vital Village. Proponents argued it would save money and enhance community services, costing only £24 per day compared to the current £1,020 per day. Critics questioned the due diligence on the newly formed CIC and its single director, fearing financial risks and lack of experience. The decision implies a significant shift in management with potential cost savings and increased community engagement but carries risks associated with the startup nature of Vital Village.
Interesting Occurrence: The meeting was marked by tension and acrimony, with some council members questioning the integrity and preparedness of the CIC's director, while others defended the thoroughness of the process and the potential community benefits. The debate highlighted deep divisions over the approach to community resource management and fiscal responsibility.
Attendees
Topics
No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.
Meeting Documents
Additional Documents