The Licensing Sub-Committee of Havering Council met on Friday 05 June 2026 to consider an application for a premises licence for The Triangle, located at 290 North Street, Romford. After hearing representations from residents and considering the evidence presented, the Sub-Committee decided to refuse the application.

Application for a Premises Licence - The Triangle, 290 North Street, Romford

The Sub-Committee considered an application for a premises licence for The Triangle, 290 North Street, Romford, RM5 3AB, made by Mr Anam Hussain. The application sought to permit live music, recorded music, late night refreshment, and the supply of alcohol for consumption on and off the premises, with operating hours extending into the early hours of the morning on certain days.

The application was met with significant opposition, with thirty-two representations submitted by local residents and two ward councillors. These objections raised concerns across all four licensing objectives: the prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, the prevention of public nuisance, and the protection of children from harm. Residents detailed issues including fighting and disorder, aggressive behaviour, congregating outside the venue, blocking residential drives, loud amplified music, exposure of children to anti-social behaviour, and sleep disturbance. Many also highlighted that the venue had previously had its premises licence revoked in March 2026 following a review by the Home Office's Immigration Enforcement Team, citing serious concerns.

There were two representations in support of the application, from named individuals who declined to provide their home addresses. No representations were received from responsible authorities.

During the hearing, the Sub-Committee heard oral representations from residents who presented video and photographic evidence of the issues they had been experiencing. The applicant, Mr Anam Hussain, was questioned by the Sub-Committee, but it became apparent that he had a limited understanding of the licensing regime and the specifics of his application. He was unable to provide clear answers regarding the premises' construction, capacity, or the management structure.

The Sub-Committee deliberated and concluded that the residents' evidence was overwhelming and largely undisputed. They found that the premises continued to undermine the licensing objectives, exacerbated by its location in a heavily residential area and its operation as a destination venue. The Sub-Committee also noted the strong indications that the previous licence holder remained involved in the operation of the premises, despite the application being made by Mr Hussain. Given the applicant's lack of understanding of the licensing regime and the persistent issues raised by residents, the Sub-Committee determined that the only appropriate step to promote the licensing objectives was to refuse the application.

The decision to refuse the application was made on the basis that granting the licence would undermine all four licensing objectives. The Sub-Committee acknowledged that no responsible authorities had made representations against the application, but this was outweighed by the substantial evidence of issues reported by residents to the police and the licensing authority.

Any party who made a relevant representation has the right to appeal the decision to the Magistrates' Court within 21 days of notification.