Limited support for New Forest

We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for New Forest Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.

You can still subscribe!

If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.

If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.

If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“How did councillors vote on Midgen Farm inclusion?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on New Forest and are not the council. About us

The council meeting focused on a debate regarding the inclusion of Midgen Farm and Ashley Manor Farm sites in the Hampshire minerals and waste plan. The meeting featured public participation, detailed discussions on environmental and community impacts, and concluded with voting on proposed motions.

Decision on the Amendment to Exclude Midgen Farm and Ashley Manor Farm: The amendment proposed to explicitly oppose the inclusion of Midgen Farm and Ashley Manor Farm in the minerals and waste plan. Proponents argued that the sites would negatively impact local ecosystems, traffic, and community well-being, citing overwhelming public opposition and environmental concerns. Opponents, including the portfolio holder, suggested that the existing plan, with modifications, could mitigate adverse effects. The amendment was ultimately rejected. This decision implies that the council will not formally oppose the inclusion of these sites in the plan, potentially allowing the extraction projects to proceed, subject to further regulatory review and conditions.

Decision on the Original Motion: Following the rejection of the amendment, the council voted on the original motion, which was less explicit and focused on ensuring that Hampshire County Council and the Secretary of State consider local concerns and implement stringent controls if the sites are retained in the plan. The motion passed, indicating a council preference for a cautious approach that seeks to balance development with community and environmental safeguards. This decision reflects a compromise stance, advocating for consideration of local impacts without outright opposition to the plan.

Interesting Occurrence: The meeting was notable for its high level of public engagement, with significant participation from local residents and council members expressing strong, often personal, viewpoints on the potential impacts of the quarry sites. The detailed and passionate input from the public and council members underscored the contentious nature of the issue and the deep community concerns surrounding local development and environmental preservation.

Attendees

No attendees have been recorded for this meeting.

Topics

No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet 26th-Mar-2024 18.30 Council

Reports Pack

Public reports pack 26th-Mar-2024 18.30 Council

Additional Documents

Printed minutes 26th-Mar-2024 18.30 Council
Hants MW Plan_special Council_26 March
Appendix 1 - MW Call in Report
Appendix 2 - Midgham Farm map