Limited support for Rother
We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for Rother Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.
You can still subscribe!
If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.
If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.
If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.
Planning Committee - Thursday 27th June 2024 9.30 am
June 27, 2024 View on council website Watch video of meeting Read transcript (Professional subscription required)Summary
The Planning Committee of Rother Council met on Thursday, 27 June 2024, to discuss several significant planning applications. The key decisions included the approval of a controversial housing development in Westfield, the refusal of a new dwelling in Bexhill, and the approval of an agricultural barn in Battle.
Cottage Lane Development Adjacent to Westfield
The committee approved the Cottage Lane Development, which involves the construction of up to 20 dwellings with new access from Cottage Lane. The decision was contentious, with significant debate around the impact on the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). Councillor Jane Clark of Westfield Parish Council opposed the development, citing concerns about the loss of agricultural land and the impact on the historic routeway. Despite these objections, the committee approved the application, noting the need for housing and the proposed biodiversity net gain.
16 Heighton Close, Bexhill
The application for a new two-storey dwelling at 16 Heighton Close was refused. The committee had previously deferred the decision to explore alternative access options to mitigate the impact on neighbouring properties. However, the revised access proposal was deemed unfeasible due to visibility issues. The primary concern was the impact of vehicle headlights on the cottages opposite the proposed site. Councillor Tony Ganly moved to refuse the application, citing the detrimental effect on the amenities of the neighbouring properties. The motion was carried with eight votes in favour, one against, and two abstentions.
Land at Big Wood, London Road, Battle
The committee approved the application for the Land at Big Wood, which involves the demolition of existing barns and the construction of a replacement barn with a small lean-to extension. The extension will include a wet room, toilet, and rest area for agricultural workers. Councillor John Barnes expressed concerns about the introduction of a septic tank but acknowledged the necessity of the facilities for the agricultural holding. The application was approved with nine votes in favour and one abstention.
Additional Information
For more details, you can refer to the Planning Applications - Index, the Agenda frontsheet, and the Public reports pack.
Attendees
Topics
No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.