Limited support for Huntingdonshire

We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for Huntingdonshire Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.

You can still subscribe!

If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.

If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.

If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.

Development Management Committee - Monday, 15 September 2025 7:00 pm

September 15, 2025 View on council website

Chat with this meeting

Subscribe to our professional plan to ask questions about this meeting.

“Will Legacy Park's traveller site conditions be permanently removed?”

Subscribe to chat
AI Generated

Summary

The Huntingdonshire Council Development Management Committee met to consider planning applications for a wellness centre and wedding venue, and for the removal or variation of conditions on planning permissions for traveller sites. The committee was also scheduled to discuss a planning services peer review action plan, and appeal decisions.

Legacy Park, Chatteris Road, Somersham

Two applications relating to Legacy Park on Chatteris Road, Somersham, were scheduled to be discussed:

  • An application to vary conditions relating to a previously granted planning permission, 18/00840/FUL, for four additional gypsy/traveller pitches. The applicant, Mr F Adams, requested the removal of a condition that limited the permission to five years, and a condition that named the specific occupants of the pitches. They also requested a variation to a condition relating to the timeframe for access works. Somersham Parish Council objected to the application. The Environment Agency also objected, stating that the removal of the time limit would allow the permanent siting of mobile homes in Flood Zone 3[^2], and that the sequential test[^3] had not been passed. [^2]: Flood Zone 3 is land assessed as having a high probability of flooding. [^3]: The sequential test is a planning process that aims to steer new development to areas with the lowest risk of flooding.

  • An application for the removal of conditions relating to a previously granted planning permission, 23/02358/FUL, for seven gypsy and traveller pitches. Mr F Adams requested the removal of conditions that limited the permission to five years, that named the specific occupants of five permanent pitches, and conditions relating to two transient pitches. They also requested a variation to a condition relating to the timeframe for access works. Somersham Parish Council objected to the application.

Hemingford Park, Common Lane, Hemingford Abbots

The committee was scheduled to consider an application for a change of use at Hemingford Park, Common Lane, Hemingford Abbots. Dr Phil Kaziewicz applied for a change of use from a dwelling and agricultural land to a wellness centre and wedding and events venue with guest sleeping accommodation and parking.

The planning statement submitted with the application stated that the venue would host weekend wedding events primarily between May and September and in December, but that they could take place all year round. When not in use for weddings, the hall and cottages would be available for holiday lets, and the wellness centre would be open to the public Monday through Thursday and on non-event weekends. The statement also noted that the event and wellness centre would operate without the use of fossil fuels, using air-source heat pumps and supplemented by an existing 50kW solar array.

Hemingford Abbots Parish Council objected to the application, raising concerns about traffic, highway safety, inadequate parking, noise and disturbance, and the impact on heritage assets. 52 letters of objection were received from local residents, with concerns raised including:

  • Harm to the historic setting through increased traffic, noise, lighting, and commercial activity
  • Impact of the track upon the ridge and furrow1, setting of the Listed Building and Conservation Area
  • Noise and disturbance to residents
  • Additional traffic and congestion
  • Inadequate parking for events
  • Potential light pollution from the events
  • Potential impact upon local biodiversity
  • Risk of increase flooding

61 letters of support were received, with points raised including:

  • Long term use of heritage assets
  • New commercial enterprise
  • Economic benefits for the local area in terms of employment and spending

Planning Services Peer Review Action Plan

The committee was scheduled to review the Planning Services Peer Review Action Plan. The plan was developed in response to the findings of a peer review of planning services, and sets out the key improvement actions currently being progressed across the service.

The action plan included the following actions:

  • Corporately recognise the value of the Local Plan - prioritise, resource and adopt a Local Plan that will help to deliver corporate priorities
  • Consider reviewing the role and membership of the Local Plan Advisory Group
  • The Planning Service needs to create a clear strategy for delivering the Place Strategy and Corporate Plan
  • Training for Councillors and Planning Committee
  • Revise the Scheme of Delegation
  • Develop a Corporately supported Communications Plan for the Planning Service
  • Develop and implement a long-term (3-year) Planning Service Improvement Programme
  • Improve Pre-application Advice Service
  • Urgent - Short Term (1-6 months)
  • Consider preparing planning guidance on Householder Extensions
  • Update Planning Enforcement Policy
  • Develop and agree a Planning and Parish and Town Councils Service Framework/Protocol
  • Set up clearer arrangements for better collaborative working between the Planning Service and key services and partners
  • Set out clear Customer Service Standards
  • Refresh and relaunch the Planning Agents and Developers Forum
  • Update the Statement of Community Involvement2

Appeal Decisions

The committee was scheduled to note the planning appeal decisions determined since August 2025:

  • Appeal Allowed: Outline application for up to 115 dwellings at Livery Stable Folly Farm, London Road, Yaxley.
  • Appeal Dismissed, Costs Refused: Variation of condition 1 of application 16/00657/FUL at 7 Marina View Mill Road, Buckden.
  • Appeal Dismissed: Erection of 2no. dwellings at 50 Windsor Road, Yaxley.

  1. Ridge and furrow is an archaeological pattern of ridges and troughs created by medieval ploughing methods. 

  2. A statement of community involvement (SCI) is a document that sets out how a local planning authority will involve the community in the planning process. 

Attendees

Profile image for CouncillorRoger John Brereton
Councillor Roger John Brereton  Conservative •  Ramsey
Profile image for CouncillorEric Richard Butler
Councillor Eric Richard Butler  Conservative •  Yaxley
Profile image for CouncillorJeff Clarke
Councillor Jeff Clarke  Conservative •  Ramsey
Profile image for CouncillorStephen John Corney
Councillor Stephen John Corney  Conservative •  Ramsey
Profile image for CouncillorDouglas Bernard Dew
Councillor Douglas Bernard Dew  Vice-Chair,Council •  Liberal Democrat •  Hemingford Grey & Houghton
Profile image for CouncillorKevin Paul Gulson
Councillor Kevin Paul Gulson  Conservative •  Yaxley
Profile image for CouncillorPatricia Ann Jordan
Councillor Patricia Ann Jordan  Liberal Democrat •  Brampton
Profile image for CouncillorSteve Richard McAdam
Councillor Steve Richard McAdam  Chair of the Council •  HDC Independent Group •  The Stukeleys
Profile image for CouncillorDebbie Lydia Mickelburgh
Councillor Debbie Lydia Mickelburgh  Chair, Development Management Committee •  Liberal Democrat •  Godmanchester & Hemingford Abbots
Profile image for CouncillorShariqa Mokbul
Councillor Shariqa Mokbul  Vice-Chair, Development Management Committee •  HDC Independent Group •  St Ives East
Profile image for CouncillorJon Neish
Councillor Jon Neish  Conservative •  Holywell-cum-Needingworth
Profile image for CouncillorBen Michael Pitt
Councillor Ben Michael Pitt  Cambs Independent Group •  St Neots Priory Park & Little Paxton
Profile image for CouncillorTom Sanderson
Councillor Tom Sanderson  Deputy Executive Leader, Vice-Chair of the Cabinet and Executive Councillor for Planning, Group Leader, HDC Independent Group •  HDC Independent Group •  The Stukeleys
Profile image for CouncillorRichard Andrew Slade
Councillor Richard Andrew Slade  Cambs Independent Group •  St Neots Priory Park & Little Paxton
Profile image for CouncillorClare Hannah Tevlin
Councillor Clare Hannah Tevlin  Liberal Democrat •  Fenstanton
Profile image for CouncillorSam Wakeford
Councillor Sam Wakeford  Executive Councillor for Economy, Regeneration and Housing, Group Leader, Labour •  Labour •  Huntingdon North

Topics

No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.

Meeting Documents

Agenda

Agenda frontsheet Monday 15-Sep-2025 19.00 Development Management Committee.pdf

Reports Pack

Public reports pack Monday 15-Sep-2025 19.00 Development Management Committee.pdf

Additional Documents

Late Reps September 25.pdf
DMC Sept 2025 Planning Peer Review Report.pdf
LATE REPRESENTATIONS Monday 15-Sep-2025 19.00 Development Management Committee.pdf
Planning Services Peer Review Action Plan - Sept DMC 1.pdf
APPEALS DETERMINED SEPTEMBER 2025.pdf
25 00972 S73 Officer Report_Redacted.pdf
25 00973 S73 Officer Report_Redacted.pdf
25 01248 FUL Officer Report.pdf
Minutes of Previous Meeting.pdf