Limited support for Windsor and Maidenhead
We do not currently provide detailed weekly summaries for Windsor and Maidenhead Council. Running the service is expensive, and we need to cover our costs.
You can still subscribe!
If you're a professional subscriber and need support for this council, get in touch with us at community@opencouncil.network and we can enable it for you.
If you're a resident, subscribe below and we'll start sending you updates when they're available. We're enabling councils rapidly across the UK in order of demand, so the more people who subscribe to your council, the sooner we'll be able to support it.
If you represent this council and would like to have it supported, please contact us at community@opencouncil.network.
Windsor and Ascot Development Management Committee - Thursday 2 October 2025 6.00 pm
October 2, 2025 View on council website Watch video of meetingSummary
The Windsor and Ascot Development Management Committee met on Thursday 2 October 2025 to discuss a planning application for land in Ascot. The meeting was also scheduled to cover declarations of interest, and approval of the minutes from the previous meeting.
Land Bounded by Ascot Fire Station, Station Hill and West of Hermitage Parade and South of High Street Ascot
Councillors were scheduled to discuss planning application 25/01050/FULL, a proposal from London Square Developments Ltd for the redevelopment of land bounded by Ascot Fire Station, Station Hill, Hermitage Parade and High Street in Ascot. The application requests permission to build 101 dwellings, and 1,775 square metres of commercial and community floorspace, with associated parking, access, open space and landscaping. The public would also benefit from new pedestrian and cycle paths, a children's play area, and both hard and soft landscaping.
The planning officer's report in the Public reports pack noted that the site is within the Ascot Centre Allocation (AL16) in the adopted Borough Local Plan (BLP). The proposed development includes a 'Gateway building' intended as a landmark, with commercial and community uses, and residential units on the upper floors. A piazza and parkland with a children's play area would provide public open space. Three and a half storey apartment blocks and three storey town houses are planned for the southern part of the site. The development would provide 135 car parking spaces.
The planning officer's report stated that the development would provide:
- 101 homes, contributing to the council's five-year housing land supply1
- 40 social rented flats
- improved pedestrian access to Ascot train station
- community space
- a large public open space and children's play area
- sustainability contributions
- associated economic benefits
- custom build plots
The report noted some conflicts with the adopted Local Plan policies, including an under-provision of 3-bedroom affordable homes, some amenity space not meeting standards, and integration issues with the scale of an apartment building next to the Cala site.
The planning officer's report stated that the council is unable to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, so planning permission should be granted unless any adverse impacts would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
The planning officer's report stated that the identified harms attract no more than limited or moderate weight, and that the benefits of the scheme outweigh the harms. The planning officer recommended that the Committee authorises the Assistant Director of Planning to approve planning permission subject to conditions and the completion of a Section 106 legal agreement2.
An October update to the report noted that there was a factual error in the committee report, and that 12, not 20, of the flats would not have private balconies. The update also clarified that the Ascot Placemaking SPD is adopted, not emerging.
The update also stated that the legal agreement should not have a mechanism to allow the community use to be released to wider commercial use after a 12-month period, and that a condition should be imposed to ensure that at a minimum floorspace of 318 square metres for community use within the Gateway Building is imposed.
The update also stated that the scheme is not an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development, as it does not exceed the thresholds as set out in the legislation.
The update summarised objections that had been received, including:
- inadequate parking provision
- existing infrastructure cannot cope with the additional development
- unacceptable loss of trees
- development is out of keeping with the character of the area
- the size of the community facility is inadequate
- scheme overprovides on commercial space
The update recommended deleting a condition relating to the Construction Management Plan, and amending the wordings of conditions relating to archaeology, construction environment management plan, contaminated land, and rhododendron remediation. It also recommended adding conditions for piling and a CEMP (Biodiversity), and a condition to ensure that at a minimum floorspace of 318 square metres for community use within the Gateway Building is imposed.
Planning Appeals Received and Planning Decision Report
The committee was also scheduled to note the contents of the Planning Appeals Received and Planning Decision Report.
-
Councils are required to maintain a sufficient supply of deliverable sites to provide five years' worth of housing, in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework. ↩
-
Section 106 agreements are legal agreements between local authorities and developers, used to mitigate the impact of new developments on the community and infrastructure. ↩
Attendees
Topics
No topics have been identified for this meeting yet.
Meeting Documents
Agenda
Reports Pack
Minutes
Additional Documents