Content

 
1.         
1 Hyde Street, Bradford                                   
Idle and Thackley
 
Construction of a detached dwelling on land
north of 1 Hyde Street, Thackley, Bradford.
 
Resolved –
 
That the application
be approved subject to the conditions set out in the Strategic
Director, Place’ technical report with the additional
condition set out below.
 
10. That work does not
commence on site until after 9am due to pedestrian use of the
adjacent lane.
 
 

2.         
Builders Yard adjacent to 9 Back Heights Road, Thornton,
Bradford

Thornton and Allerton

 
Full application
seeking permission for the demolition of commercial buildings,
construction of a detached dwelling and associated works at
Builders Yard adjacent to 9 Back Heights Road, Thornton.
 
Resolved –
 
That the application be
approved subject to the conditions set out in the Strategic
Director, Place’ technical report.
 
 
3. 122 Bradford Road,
Clayton, Bradford      

Clayton and Fairweather Green

 
Extension to side,
hip to gable roof with front and rear dormers to existing
dwelling.  Construction of 3 No
dwellings in the side garden with extended dropped kerb on
Crestville Road at the above site.
 
No resolution was passed
on this item as the application was withdrawn prior to the
meeting.
 
 

4.         
89 Tong Lane, Bradford                                             
  Tong
 
Application for the
demolition of existing rear extension and side
conservatory.  Construction of new
2 storey rear extension and single storey side
extension.  Replace cesspit with new
septic plant with soakaway, and new access drive at 89 Tong Lane,
Bradford.
 
Resolved –
 
That the application be
approved. 
 
Reason
 
Members determined that the proposed extension was
not a disproportionate addition to the original building and did
not, therefore, represent inappropriate development in the green
belt.
 
'The design of the extension was acceptable and
replaced existing additions to the dwelling. The screening caused
by the hedge to the front of the site and the limited visibility of
the rear elevation mean that the proposed extension would not be
particularly prominent and would not harm the appearance of the
dwelling or its contribution to the amenity of the wider
area.