Capital Transport Programme - Prioritisation Framework

November 4, 2026 Transport Committee, Combined Authority Board (Committee) Key decision Awaiting outcome View on council website

This summary is generated by AI from the council’s published record and supporting documents. Check the full council record and source link before relying on it.

Summary

The Transport Committee, Combined Authority Board decided on 04/11/2026 to note Steer consultants’ independent prioritisation framework and assessment of schemes. Recommendations B through G were defeated as they did not meet the Transport Committee’s voting requirements.

Full council record

Purpose

To approve the Capital Programme

Decision

RESOLVED:

A.    To note Steer consultants’ independent prioritisation framework and assessment of schemes.

The following recommendations, on being put to the vote, did not meet the Transport Committee’s voting requirements as set out in the constitution at 5.17.7 Special Voting.pdf and therefore were not approved.

DEFEATED:

B.    To recommend to the Combined Authority Board to assign a proportion of the Local Transport Grant – Capital allocation (now the Mayoral Transport Fund), releasing up to £17.2 million over the period shown in Table 2, to supplement all remaining Gainshare Funding for priority schemes (Option 1 in section 2.5) within the wider Capital Transport Program

C.   To recommend to the Combined Authority Board to assign a proportion of the Local Transport Grant – Capital allocation (now the Mayoral Transport Fund), releasing up to £17.2 million over the period shown in Table 2, to supplement all remaining Gainshare Funding for priority schemes (Option 1 in section 2.5) within the wider Capital Transport Program

D.   To recommend to the Combined Authority Board totarget use of the identified £646,000 of Local Transport Grant – Revenue over the next three years to fund feasibility studies of early-stage transport concepts and regional transport challenges. This would help establish which interventions merit further development and potential capital investment after progressing the ‘study’ phase

E.    To recommend to the Combined Authority Board, that based on the prioritisation framework and assessment of schemes, the ‘study’ scheme areas as set out in section 2.12 are prioritised.

F.    To recommend to the Combined Authority Board, that based on the prioritisation framework and assessment of schemes, the ‘study’ scheme areas as set out in section 2.13 are prioritised.

G.   To recommend to the Combined Authority Board, that based on the prioritisation framework and assessment of schemes, the ‘study’ scheme areas as set out in section 2.14 are prioritised

Supporting Documents

Standing Orders.pdf
Appendix D - Delivery Pot Scoring Summary.pdf
Appendix A - Steer Scheme Scoring Summary Slides.pdf
Capital Transport Programme Prioritisation Framework.pdf
Appendix B - Study Pot Scoring Summary.pdf
Appendix C - Develop Pot Scoring Summary.pdf
Appendix E - CPCA Prioritisation Framework Methodology Report.pdf

Details

OutcomeFor Determination
Decision date4 Nov 2026
Expected date25 Nov 2026
Originally due23 Sep 2026
Lead officerTim Bellamy