This week in Tunbridge Wells:

New Convenience Store Gets Alcohol Licence Despite Resident Objections

The Licensing Sub-Committee met on Tuesday, 1 September 2026, and granted a new premises licence for Silver Express, a convenience store at 173 Silverdale Road, Tunbridge Wells. The store will be permitted to sell alcohol for off-premises consumption daily from 7 am to 11 pm. This decision came despite two local residents raising concerns about potential increases in crime and public nuisance.

Concerns Over Alcohol Sales and Community Impact

The application for Silver Express, a new convenience store, sought permission to sell alcohol for consumption off the premises between 7 am and 11 pm daily. During the public consultation, two residents objected, fearing that the increased availability of alcohol in an area already experiencing issues with anti-social behaviour would exacerbate these problems. One resident, Rachel Collins, stated, My concern is not simply the addition of another shop, but that increasing the availability of alcohol in an area where there are already ongoing issues with anti-social behaviour is likely to make these problems worse. ¹ Another resident, Elizabeth Fraser, highlighted existing problems with public drinking and litter, arguing that the proposed mitigation measures were insufficient.

However, no objections were received from statutory authorities, including the police. The applicant's representative, Mr. Frank Fender, highlighted the applicant's 12 years of experience selling alcohol without issue at previous premises. He also pointed out that need is not a consideration for licensing. Need is dealt with by market forces. Not not licensing. ² The applicant proposed a comprehensive operating schedule with conditions designed to uphold licensing objectives, including CCTV, staff training, and a Challenge 25 policy.

Licence Granted with Conditions

After considering the application and the representations, the Sub-Committee decided to grant the licence as applied for, including all proposed conditions. This means that while residents' concerns were heard, the committee found that the applicant's proposed measures were sufficient to address potential issues.

• Why this matters: This decision directly impacts the local environment on Silverdale Road. While the applicant has a history of responsible alcohol sales, the concerns raised by residents highlight the delicate balance between supporting new businesses and maintaining community well-being. For those living nearby, the granting of this licence means increased potential for late-night activity, and the effectiveness of the imposed conditions will be crucial in preventing any negative impact on their quality of life.

Read the full Licensing Sub-Committee meeting details here

This week in Tunbridge Wells:

Hawkhurst Business Park Expansion Deferred Amidst Landscape and Drainage Concerns

The Planning Committee met on Wednesday, 19 August 2026, to consider a significant application for a new B2 general industrial building at Hawkhurst Station Business Park. After extensive debate, the committee voted to defer the decision, requesting further discussions with the applicant regarding the building's size and scale. This move reflects deep-seated concerns about the development's impact on the High Weald National Landscape and unresolved issues surrounding drainage.

A Clash of Interests: Jobs vs. Landscape Protection

The proposal for a 3,220 square metre industrial building at Hawkhurst Station Business Park, Gills Green, Cranbrook, was met with strong opposition from residents and the High Weald National Landscape Partnership. Objectors voiced worries about the building's scale, massing, and visual impact within the sensitive landscape, as well as potential increases in noise, air pollution, and traffic. Cranbrook and Sissinghurst Parish Council, while supporting the principle of employment development, recommended refusal due to concerns about cumulative impacts on highway safety, amenity, dark skies, and air quality.

Supporters, including the applicant, highlighted the creation of approximately 60 jobs and the importance of the development for the expansion of existing tenant Rhokett. They argued that the building's design had been reduced in response to previous concerns and that it would be located on a site allocated for employment in the local plan.

However, the scale of the proposed building, standing at up to 8.8 metres high, was a major point of contention. Councillor Don Kent noted that while the site is allocated for employment, the proposed building's size and its proximity to sensitive areas raised significant questions. Councillor Lynne Darrah expressed concern that the development, even with reductions, remained too large for the location and would negatively impact the rural character of the area.

Drainage Dilemma: Unresolved Issues Threaten Approval

A significant portion of the debate focused on drainage. Objectors and speakers like Ian Dodson raised serious concerns about the existing surface water problems on the land and the inadequacy of the proposed drainage strategy. They argued that the plan relied on ditches and land not in the applicant's control and that there was no proven connection to downstream watercourses. KCC Flood and Water Management had requested proof of downstream connectivity, which was absent.

The committee grappled with the enforceability of drainage conditions, with Councillor Christopher Digby questioning how a condition could be met if it relied on third-party agreements not yet secured. The officer's response that it was a pre-commencement condition, meaning development could not start until it was discharged, did little to fully alleviate these concerns.

The Decision to Defer: Seeking a Better Balance

Ultimately, the committee voted by six to two to defer the application. Councillor Hugo Pound proposed the deferral, seeking further discussions with the applicant to address the size and scale of the building. This decision reflects a desire to find a more appropriate balance between economic benefits and the imperative to protect the High Weald National Landscape and resolve critical infrastructure issues.

• Why this matters: This deferral highlights the tension between the need for economic development and job creation, and the council's duty to protect its unique natural environment. For residents, particularly those living near the proposed site, the outcome of these further discussions will determine the future character of their neighbourhood and the potential impact on their quality of life. The unresolved drainage issues also underscore the critical importance of robust infrastructure planning for any new development, especially in areas prone to flooding.

Read the full Planning Committee meeting details here

Crematorium Waiting Pavilion and Residential Extensions Approved

In addition to the Hawkhurst application, the Planning Committee also unanimously approved several other applications:

Replacement Crematorium Waiting Pavilion

The committee approved the replacement of the existing crematorium waiting pavilion at Tunbridge Wells Borough Cemetery, Benhall Mill Road. The new, slightly larger building will replace an outdated structure. Councillors noted its limited visibility due to screening and its lack of impact on the adjacent Grade II listed Mortuary Chapel. A condition for a contamination watching brief was included due to the site's location.

• Why this matters: This decision ensures that a vital facility for grieving families is updated and improved, providing a more comfortable and modern space during difficult times.

Extension and Garage at 23 Hilbert Road

A single-storey front extension and garage at 23 Hilbert Road were also unanimously approved. The proposed works were found to be in keeping with the existing dwelling and would not harm residential or visual amenity.

• Why this matters: This approval allows residents to improve their homes, demonstrating how the council balances individual property improvements with neighbourhood character.

Lawful Development Certificate for Dropped Kerb

A lawful development certificate was granted for a dropped kerb at 2A Sherwood Road. This confirms that the creation of the access is permitted development and does not require a full planning application.

• Why this matters: This streamlines the process for residents making minor property alterations, ensuring they can proceed with necessary improvements while adhering to regulations.

This week in Tunbridge Wells:

Pub Licence Variation Sparks Noise Row: Residents Fear Loss of Peace

The Licensing Sub-Committee met on Thursday 13 August 2026 to consider a controversial application to vary the premises licence for The Goudhurst Inn, now known as The Winemaker's Pub. While the committee granted changes to alcohol sales and opening hours, they refused the request for live music, citing existing legislation. However, four additional conditions were imposed on the licence, aiming to address resident concerns.

The Winemaker's Pub: A Village Asset or a Noise Nuisance?

The application, submitted by Warwick Balfour Capital LLP, sought to amend the pub's licence to allow for more flexible alcohol sales and opening hours, and crucially, to introduce live music both indoors and outdoors. The applicants argued that the current licence was outdated and that these changes were essential for the business's long-term success, especially after a significant £250,000 refurbishment. They described the pub as a premium country pub and stressed their commitment to being a village asset.

However, the application triggered strong objections from 11 local residents. Their primary concerns revolved around the prevention of public nuisance and the protection of children from harm. Residents like Nick Lucas, whose home is 250 metres away on Burrisford Road, stated that music from previous events was clearly heard, impacting approximately 90 properties. Concerns were raised about the potential for increased noise pollution from outdoor music, particularly during summer evenings, and the impact of late-night indoor music on children's sleep.

One objector, James Rourke, highlighted that a permanent licence for live music would effectively handcuffing both the council and residents, as it attaches to the property, not the operator, potentially leaving future owners free to exploit the licence. He also pointed out that the applicant's website actively promoted live music, contradicting claims that it would be occasional.

The Committee's Decision: A Compromise with Conditions

After hearing from all parties, the Licensing Sub-Committee, advised by legal advisor Helen Ward, made a decision that sought to balance the applicant's business needs with the residents' desire for peace.

• Alcohol Sales and Opening Hours: The application to vary the times for the sale of alcohol and opening hours was granted. This includes the ability to sell alcohol between 3 pm and 5 pm on Thursdays.
• Live Music: The request for live music, both indoors and outdoors, was refused. The committee noted that the applicant could already rely on the provisions of the Live Music Act 2012¹ for such activities.
• Additional Conditions: To further safeguard residents, four new conditions were imposed on the premises licence:
  1. Customers, other than hotel residents and their guests, must leave the premises within 30 minutes of the permitted alcohol sales hours ending.
  2. Residents' meetings must be held at least every six months, with attendance and minutes recorded for three years.
  3. The licence holder must maintain a noise management policy and ensure staff are trained on it.
  4. The licence holder must maintain a complaints handling procedure and ensure staff are trained to deal with complaints.

The written decision, detailing the full reasons for the subcommittee's determination, will be provided to all parties.

• Why this matters: This decision directly impacts the quality of life for residents living near The Winemaker's Pub. While the refusal of live music on the licence addresses a key concern, the imposed conditions aim to ensure better communication and management of noise. For vulnerable residents, such as those with young children or who are sensitive to noise, these measures are crucial for maintaining their peace and well-being. The ongoing dialogue between businesses and residents is vital for a harmonious community.

Read the full Licensing Sub-Committee meeting details here

This week in Tunbridge Wells:

Water Infrastructure and Housing Growth: A Balancing Act for the Future

The Overview and Scrutiny Committee met on Monday, 27 July 2026, to discuss critical issues surrounding housing development and the vital infrastructure needed to support it, particularly water supply. While no formal decisions were made, the discussions highlighted the complex challenges the council faces in ensuring sustainable growth.

Housing Delivery Meets Water Capacity

A key agenda item was a presentation on how the council's plans for housing delivery can be integrated with water provision and infrastructure. This is a crucial conversation because as more homes are built, the demand on our water resources increases. Ensuring that our water supply network can cope is essential for the daily lives of all residents, preventing potential shortages and maintaining service quality.

South East Water Task and Finish Group Update

The committee also received an update from the South East Water Task and Finish Group. This group has been specifically examining issues related to water supply and infrastructure, especially in light of past supply disruptions that have affected residents. Previous discussions with South East Water have focused on investment in infrastructure and communication during outages. The group's work is aimed at finding ways to improve the reliability of water services for everyone in the borough.

Reviewing the Committee's Work Programme

The committee also looked ahead to its future work programme. This involves identifying key areas for scrutiny in upcoming meetings, which could include further discussions with water providers like Southern Water, reviews of transportation, and considerations of flood mitigation measures.

• Why this matters: The availability and reliability of water are fundamental to our daily lives. As Tunbridge Wells continues to grow, ensuring that our water infrastructure keeps pace is paramount. This is particularly important for vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and those with specific medical needs, who can be severely impacted by water supply issues. The council's ability to coordinate with water companies and plan for future demand will directly affect the quality of life for all residents.

Read the full Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting details here