Subscribe to updates
You'll receive weekly summaries about Staffordshire Council every week.
If you have any requests or comments please let us know at community@opencouncil.network. We can also provide custom updates on particular topics across councils.
Prefer no ads? Become a Supporter for £3.50/month
County Council - Thursday, 16 July 2026 - 10:00am
July 16, 2026 at 10:00 am County Council View on council websiteSummary
Open Council Network is an independent organisation. We report on Staffordshire and are not the council. About us
The Staffordshire County Council meeting on Thursday 16 July 2026 addressed a wide range of issues, including significant debate on the proposed Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) for Staffordshire, which was announced during the meeting. Councillors also discussed the Council's financial outturn for the previous year, the ongoing challenges with highway maintenance, and the national government's approach to planning and SEND reforms.
The meeting began with apologies for absence and a declaration of interests, followed by the confirmation of previous minutes, with an amendment requested by Councillor Greatorex regarding a previous accusation. Tributes were paid to the late Ann Widdecombe, and Councillor Jonathan Pike was welcomed following his election. The Council also congratulated Staffordshire residents recognised in the King's Birthday Honours.
A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) announcement. The Leader of the Council, Councillor Martin Murray, and the Leader of the Opposition, Councillor Philip White, both expressed strong opposition to the government's decision to split Staffordshire into two unitary authorities: North Staffordshire (including Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire Moorlands, and Stoke-on-Trent) and South Staffordshire (including East Staffordshire, Lichfield, Tamworth, Cannock, Stafford, and South Staffordshire). Councillors across the chamber voiced concerns about the lack of democratic mandate, the potential financial implications, the loss of local identity, and the impact on services and residents. Despite their opposition, councillors acknowledged the need to work together to mitigate the negative impacts of this imposed change.
The Council debated and discussed motions concerning child welfare and the Peak Cluster carbon capture pipeline. The motion on child welfare and the Pathways trial was noted, reaffirming the Council's commitment to safeguarding. The Peak Cluster motion also called for greater local engagement and consideration of alternative methods for carbon capture. A third motion, proposed by Councillor Murray, on equality, individual dignity and merit, proportionality, rejection of compelled conformity, and transparency and public trust, was also passed, with broad cross-party support.
Significant discussion also took place regarding highway maintenance, with councillors raising concerns about the quality and timeliness of repairs, while the Cabinet Member for Strategic Highways, Councillor Peter Mason, outlined the Council's new proactive approach and investment in tackling the backlog of defects. The Skills for Growth Plan was discussed, with a focus on securing £150 million for skills and employment support. The Council also discussed SEND reform, aiming to improve support for children with special educational needs and disabilities.
Other key items included the 2025 Community Fund Report, which highlighted the successful allocation of £144,211 to 234 community groups, and the Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report 2025-26, which detailed the committees' work in holding the Council to account. Amendments to the Council's Constitution were approved, including amendments to procedural standing orders and the adoption of a Councillor Dress Code. The reduction in the number of Vice-Chairs to Overview and Scrutiny Committees was also approved.
Finally, the Council addressed questions on various topics, including the Chase Road consultation, the Registrar Service, adult social care pressures, bridgeworks delays, security costs, development pressures in Tamworth, highway maintenance, Rugeley's future economy, SEND reforms, solar farms, fire risks in country parks, and climate change objectives within the Pension Fund. The meeting concluded with the Chairman thanking members for their contributions and declaring the meeting closed.
Attendees
Topics
Meeting Documents
Minutes
Additional Documents