Is this you? Claim this page.

AI Generated

Positions, Voting Record & Activity Summary

Last updated: about 20 hours ago

M Can Ozsen's council service, spanning from 2014 to 2026, reveals a consistent engagement with scrutiny and policy development, with a notable shift towards housing and financial matters in recent years. While earlier years saw a broader focus on public safety, urban planning, and youth services, Ozsen's recent activities, particularly in 2025 and 2026, highlight a deep dive into housing policy and committee governance.

In the most recent year, 2026, Ozsen's recorded activities were primarily centered on committee memberships and attendance. While absent from a Living in Hackney Scrutiny Commission meeting in January, they were listed as a member of the Corporate Committee in March. This follows a pattern from late 2025 where apologies for absence were noted, indicating a continued, albeit sometimes limited, presence in council proceedings.

Looking at 2025, Ozsen demonstrated significant engagement, particularly with financial and housing policies. They voted in favor of a resolution on Council Taxbase and Local Business Rates Income in February, but later voted against Green Group Amendments to the budget in May. A standout contribution was in July during the Living in Hackney Scrutiny Commission, where Ozsen actively probed the council's future social rent housing plans. Their detailed questions focused on progress, timescales, priorities, evidence gathering, and opportunities for policy changes, funding, and partnerships to meet local housing needs. Ozsen articulated this by stating,

It's about the future plans. What progress has been made in developing a future program of new homes for social rent? And what are the associated timescales? What are some of the emerging priorities for any future program? And what evidence gathering has taken place to inform them? That's my first question.
They further emphasized the need for ambitious plans by asking,
My second question is what are some of the key opportunities which may enable the council to deliver an ambitious future program of new homes for social rent which truly reflects local housing needs. For example, policy and legislative changes, new funding opportunities and relationships with the key partners.

Prior to these recent years, Ozsen's contributions were more varied. In 2024, activity was limited to apologies for absence and attendance at the Living in Hackney Scrutiny Commission. In 2023, their focus was primarily on the Pensions Committee. The years 2020 and 2019 saw Ozsen actively addressing public safety, crime prevention, product safety, and urban planning issues, including advocating for knife amnesty boxes and questioning pavement parking. They also engaged with food hygiene inspections and the adequacy of the Local Plan. In 2018, Ozsen was involved with the Energy from Waste facility, advocating for a comprehensive review and investigation into advanced technologies. Earlier years, from 2014 to 2017, show a consistent involvement in scrutiny commissions, particularly concerning children and young people, and participation in planning and corporate committees, with a notable focus on local health service provision in 2017.

Overall, M Can Ozsen's priorities appear to have evolved from a broad concern for public safety and urban planning in earlier years to a more concentrated focus on housing policy and financial matters in recent times. Their consistent engagement in scrutiny commissions across multiple years, particularly the Living in Hackney Scrutiny Commission, underscores a dedication to holding the council accountable and driving policy improvements. The detailed questioning in 2025 regarding social rent housing stands out as a significant recent contribution, reflecting a deep commitment to addressing local housing needs.

Yearly Activity Timeline

In 2026, M Can Ozsen's recorded activities primarily involved their committee memberships and attendance. They were absent from the Living in Hackney Scrutiny Commission meeting in January. In March, they were listed as a member of the Corporate Committee, though no specific actions or statements were recorded for them during that meeting. Previous records from late 2025 indicate they had sent apologies for absence from a meeting.

Monthly Activity in 2026

During March 2026, M Can Ozsen was listed as a member of the Corporate Committee for the meeting on March 18th. However, there is no record of M Can Ozsen saying or doing anything during this meeting. Previous meeting minutes from November 12, 2025, indicate that Councillor Ozsen had sent apologies for absence.

Meetings in March 2026

Select a meeting to load its activity summary.

Activity Timeline

Meetings Attended Note this may include planned future meetings.

272 meetings · Page 1 of 55

Council Committee Member

Council - Wednesday, 22 July 2026 - 7.00 pm

July 22, 2026, 7:00 pm
Corporate Committee MOVED Committee Member

Corporate Committee - Tuesday, 9 June 2026 - 6.30 pm

June 09, 2026, 6:30 pm
Corporate Committee Committee Member

Corporate Committee - Tuesday, 2 June 2026 - 6.30 pm

June 02, 2026, 6:30 pm
Council Committee Member

Council - Thursday, 28 May 2026 - 7.00 pm

May 28, 2026, 7:00 pm
Corporate Committee Committee Member

Corporate Committee - Wednesday 18 March 2026 6.30 pm

The Corporate Committee of Hackney Council met on Wednesday 18 March 2026, approving a new Planning Code of Conduct for Councillors and noting updates on the Corporate Peer Challenge. The committee also deferred decisions on the Annual Performance review of Markets, Shop Fronts & Street Trading and the Fees and Charges review until the next municipal year.

March 18, 2026, 6:30 pm

Decisions from Meetings

123 decisions · Page 1 of 25

Annual Performance review of Markets, Shop Fronts & Street Trading

From: Corporate Committee - Wednesday 18 March 2026 6.30 pm - March 18, 2026

The Corporate Committee of Hackney Council on Wednesday 18 March 2026 approved recommendations. The item was deferred until the 2026/27 municipal year.

Recommendations Approved

Planning Code of Conduct (for the Hackney Constitution)

From: Corporate Committee - Wednesday 18 March 2026 6.30 pm - March 18, 2026

The Corporate Committee of Hackney Council approved the new planning code of conduct for Councillors on 18 March 2026. The committee also delegated authority to the Monitoring Officer, in consultation with the Assistant Director Planning and Building Control, to make changes to the code.

Recommendations Approved

Corporate Peer Challenge update

From: Corporate Committee - Wednesday 18 March 2026 6.30 pm - March 18, 2026

The Corporate Committee of Hackney Council decided to note the contents of the report on 18 March 2026. The report provided an update on the Council's response to recommendations from the Local Government Association Corporate Peer Challenge. Mitigations are in place through strengthened governance, financial boards, and transformation oversight.

Recommendations Approved

Consideration of Minutes Of The Previous Meeting and actions from the previous meeting

From: Corporate Committee - Wednesday 18 March 2026 6.30 pm - March 18, 2026

The Corporate Committee of Hackney Council approved the minutes of their previous meeting held on 12 November 2025. The committee also approved the Pay Policy Statement for Chief Officers 2026/27. The Assistant Director Planning and Building Control will provide further guidance on supporting residents and businesses in the planning process and amend the section on lobbyists in the new Planning Code of Conduct.

Recommendations Approved

Annual Performance Report of the Noise Service 2024/25

From: Corporate Committee - Wednesday 18 March 2026 6.30 pm - March 18, 2026

The Corporate Committee of Hackney Council noted the Annual Performance Report of the Noise Service 2024/25 on 18 March 2026. The report provided an update on noise nuisance for the period January to December 2025.

Recommendations Approved

Summary

Meetings Attended: 272

Average per Month: 1.9

Decisions Recorded: 123 Not all decisions are recorded, so this may significantly underestimate the number of decisions actually made.