The Traffic and Road Safety Advisory Panel (TARSAP) met on Tuesday 21 July 2026 to discuss various traffic and road safety matters. Key discussions included the prioritisation of 20mph zones, concerns over parking in Eastman Village, and updates on traffic schemes across the borough. The panel also reviewed the outcome of an experimental traffic order trial in Rayners Lane Town Centre.

20mph Zone Prioritisation

Mr Alan Moss raised concerns about the prioritisation of 20mph zones, specifically for the Pinn of View area, citing resident and vehicle safety issues and a history of accidents on roads such as Devonshire Road and Sussex Road. He questioned how areas were prioritised, the metrics used, and the implementation timelines. Councillor Ameet Jogia MBE, Chair of TARSAP, explained that the council receives a high volume of requests and that the programme is currently being reviewed using updated data. All locations will be reprioritised based on factors including vehicle speeds, proximity to traffic generators like schools, stakeholder input, and existing traffic calming measures. New requests will also be incorporated, potentially altering priority lists. The assessment is expected to be completed in September, with further details to be provided then. Mr Moss highlighted that his area's request had been ongoing for approximately 10 years and that a petition for a Low Traffic Neighbourhood scheme, which included a 20mph limit, had been withdrawn. He expressed frustration that the 20mph limit was removed without clear explanation, despite ongoing accident concerns and dangers to children. Councillor Jogia acknowledged Mr Moss's frustration and assured him that his request was taken seriously. He noted that the list is being refreshed for September and will be discussed later that evening. He also stated that he would review the speeding data for Pinn of View with officers to assess if there was room for prioritisation.

Eastman Village Parking Issues

Councillor David Perry, Leader of the Labour Group, raised concerns regarding parking issues at Eastman Village, a former Kodak site¹. He highlighted that the development, which can accommodate up to 2,000 households, currently has only about 30% parking capacity, leading to displaced parking and overflow onto surrounding streets. A recent controlled parking zone (CPZ) extension in the area has exacerbated these issues, prompting a petition signed by 268 residents concerning visitor parking and carer access. Councillor Perry expressed disappointment with the council's formal response to the petition, which he felt did not adequately address the broader implications of regeneration and displaced parking. He suggested exploring opportunities to increase parking provision in the wider area and questioned the council's framework for dealing with such issues. He also asked about the council's strategy for working with developers to discourage car ownership among new residents and sought an update on wider junction improvements that have been delayed.

Councillor David Ashton, Portfolio Holder for Finance and Highways, acknowledged the concerns and stated that the portfolio holder, Councillor Ashton, had been looking into alternative off-site parking options. He also mentioned that over £2 million in contributions from the development had been allocated to highways for improvements to walking and cycling infrastructure, and additional bus services were in place to mitigate the development's impact. Laura McIntosh, Transportation Manager, confirmed that the council is working within site constraints and that the CPZ was part of the original Section 106 agreement. Regarding junction improvements, Councillor Ashton advised that Pinner Road Station Road would be prioritised due to funding constraints, with the scheme needing to be delivered by the end of the next financial year. The Goodwill to Wall Junction could not be delivered simultaneously due to proximity and potential disruption.

Edward Poynton, representing Harrow Cyclists, supported Councillor Perry's statement, noting that while developers are required to install active transport infrastructure, there is a lack of good active transport infrastructure connecting developments to the wider borough. He argued that developments often lag behind the development of the site, leading to a failure to achieve anticipated reductions in car usage. Councillor Ameet Jogia MBE, Chair, noted that many planning committee colleagues see this issue repeatedly with large developments, where car-free zones are not realised in practice.

Traffic Schemes Update

John Hinkley, representing Harrow Resident Motorists, raised concerns about the communication surrounding the Harrow to Pinner cycleway construction, describing it as abysmal. He noted significant traffic delays, with journeys taking up to an hour at peak times, and mentioned rumours of work pausing for August. He also highlighted the impact on local businesses, such as a fish and chip shop that feels the council is conspiring to bankrupt them due to business disruption. Poonam Pathak from the comms team confirmed that a newsletter would be distributed that week to immediately affected residents and a wider area, and it could also be sent to the Pinner Association.

Councillor Thaya Idaikkadar raised concerns about the George 5th Avenue-Pinner Road junction outside Noah Hill School, highlighting safety issues for children crossing. She noted that while funding was previously lacking, TfL has announced new funding for active transport, and asked about plans to improve the junction. Laura McIntosh stated that there was no additional funding yet but that the scheme was at the top of TfL's list if surplus funding became available. She confirmed that designs were being worked on in the background. The headteacher of Noah Hill School had also written to the council expressing concerns about the junction's safety and urging urgent work with the school to apply for funding.

Councillor Benjamin inquired about the enlargement of a pedestrian refuge between Station Road, Elm Grove Road and Hines Road. It was confirmed that this was the proposal and it was going through TfL's signals process. The potential for further alterations due to a proposed Tesco store was also noted. Councillor Benjamin asked if the design could be brought before the panel or ward councillors before going to TfL, but was informed it was already with TfL and the process could take around 18 months if modelling was required.

Petitions Received

Several petitions were presented and discussed:

• Wealdstone Royal Estate Zone C CPZ: Mary Turner and Chef Aldridge presented a petition requesting a change to the parking restrictions from 8am to 6:30pm Monday to Saturday to 10am to 11am and 2pm to 3pm Monday to Friday. They argued these times would be less disruptive and had worked well elsewhere. The petition would be collected and considered by the panel.
• East Coast Lane Traffic Calming: A petition signed by 35 residents requested effective traffic calming measures to reduce speeding and improve safety. This was also noted for consideration.
• Petition on behalf of residents of East Coast Lane: This petition, signed by 35 residents, called for effective traffic calming measures to reduce speeding and improve safety.
• Petition regarding Roxeth Green Avenue: Concerns were raised about the 30mph speed limit and the lack of a pedestrian crossing. Officers stated that while speed surveys indicated compliance with the 30mph limit, the location scored higher due to its collision history. Physical traffic calming was not considered appropriate for this main route, but 30mph Slow Down signs and SLOW markings had been implemented. The request for a pedestrian crossing did not meet the threshold for intervention but would remain under review.
• Petition regarding Station Road / Elm Grove Road: This petition requested increased enforcement of speed and parking restrictions, a new controlled crossing, and renewal of the footway. Enforcement for parking had been forwarded to the relevant team, and speeding enforcement is a police matter. Access improvements to the school entrance had been completed, and the pedestrian refuge island was to be enlarged, with works anticipated in Summer/Autumn 2026.
• Petition regarding Eastman Village: Councillor Perry presented a petition from 268 residents regarding parking issues, visitor parking, and carer access. This was discussed extensively (see above).
• Petition regarding Windsor Crescent and Windsor Close: This petition objected to proposed 'at any time' restrictions. Officers informed the lead petitioner that the measures were being introduced for safety and access reasons and that the council would not recommend their removal. The Portfolio Holder would be informed of the petition.
• Petition regarding Dickson Fold: This petition requested a CPZ, increased enforcement, and improvements to 'No Through Road' signs. The parking requests would be assessed and reported to the Portfolio Holder. An additional 'No Through Road' sign would be proposed.
• Petition regarding Rama Court: This petition requested a CPZ. The request would be assessed and reported to the Portfolio Holder.
• Petition regarding St Brides Avenue: This petition requested carriageway resurfacing, reinstatement of grass verges to hardstanding, and painting of 20mph speed roundels. Speed surveys indicated compliance with the 20mph limit, so no additional speed-related interventions were considered necessary. Requests concerning speed enforcement fall under the police remit.

Parking Programme Update

The report provided an update on the council's parking programme, including CPZ reviews, localised safety parking schemes, and disabled person's parking spaces. The council is moving towards a data and demand-led Strategic CPZ Consultation Rollout Programme. The report detailed the five-stage CPZ scheme delivery process and the alternative Experimental Traffic Management Order (ETMO) process, which allows for quicker implementation. Appendix A provided the status of various CPZ items, including ongoing reviews and new proposals.

Active and Sustainable Travel and Road Safety Report

This report provided an update on initiatives to encourage sustainable transport, active travel, and road safety education. The development of the borough's Long-Term Transport Strategy sub-strategies, including the Active Travel Strategy, was progressing, with public engagement planned for July and August 2026. The Schools Vicinity Improvement Programme was underway, focusing on School Keep Clear improvements. Progress was also reported on electric vehicle charging points and an increase in cycle training sessions delivered in 2025/26.

The Road Safety Performance and Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI) Casualty Review 2020–2025 highlighted that pedestrians remain the most vulnerable road user group, with older people disproportionately represented in fatal collisions. Ineffective observation and inappropriate speed were recurring contributory factors in serious and fatal collisions. The report recommended a refocusing of investment towards pedestrian safety, targeted expansion of the 20mph programme, dedicated funding for motorcyclist and cyclist safety, and behaviour change investment towards older pedestrians and younger male road users.

Outcome of the Six Month Experimental Traffic Order Trial: Rayners Lane Town Centre

The panel reviewed the outcomes of the six-month experimental traffic order trial for the Red Route in parts of Rayners Lane, Alexandra Avenue, and Village Way East. Monitoring showed a significant reduction in double parking, improving traffic flow and safety. However, feedback from consultation and stakeholders indicated a need for modifications.

Recommendations to Cabinet included:

• Noting the outcomes of the trial.
• Approving the making of the Experimental Traffic Order permanent.
• Approving minor modifications, including revising loading bay operating hours, retaining 24-hour motorcycle bays, reinstating a taxi bay, and improving pick-up/drop-off provision on adjacent streets.
• Delegating authority to the Strategic Director to finalise minor amendments.

Councillor Thaya Idaikkadar and Councillor Krishna Suresh provided comments, highlighting concerns about the differentiation between licensed taxis and private hire vehicles, the extent of loading bay provisions, the need for convenient short-term access near the station, and the proposed extension of CPZ operating hours. They requested further engagement with local traders and a review of CPZ hours.